Roscoe Joseph A, Bushunow Peter, Morrow Gary R, Hickok Jane T, Kuebler Philip J, Jacobs Andrew, Banerjee Tarit K
Behavioral Medicine Unit, University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base, University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York.
Cancer. 2004 Dec 1;101(11):2701-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20718.
Patients may use their past experiences with nausea, as well as information about the incidence of nausea from chemotherapy that other patients have experienced, to form a prediction, or response expectancy, of nausea from their own upcoming chemotherapy. Mounting evidence suggests that these expectancies relating to nausea are significant predictors, and, likely, contributing factors to the development of treatment-related nausea.
The patients in the current study were participants in the control arm of a multicenter clinical trial conducted between November 1999 and July 2001 by the University of Rochester Community Clinical Oncology Program. All patients in the current report were age >/= 18 years and were about to begin a first cancer treatment regimen containing doxorubicin.
Expectancy of nausea assessed before patients received their first doxorubicin-based chemotherapy treatment was found to be a strong predictor of subsequent nausea and in fact was stronger than previously reported predictive factors, including age, nausea during pregnancy, and susceptibility to motion sickness. Women who believed it was "very likely" that they would have severe nausea from chemotherapy were five times more likely to experience severe nausea than fellow patients who thought its occurrence would be "very unlikely."
Further studies confirming an expectancy of nausea as a risk factor are warranted as are studies examining the benefit to a patient's quality of life from modifying antiemetic treatment guidelines to take into account symptom expectancies. Finally, ethically acceptable interventions that are designed to reduce patients' nausea expectancies or increase their expectancies of nausea control should be developed and studied.
患者可能会利用自己过去恶心的经历,以及其他患者化疗后恶心发生率的信息,来预测自己即将进行的化疗中恶心的情况,即形成对恶心的反应预期。越来越多的证据表明,这些与恶心相关的预期是重要的预测指标,而且可能是导致治疗相关恶心发生的因素。
本研究中的患者是罗切斯特大学社区临床肿瘤项目在1999年11月至2001年7月进行的一项多中心临床试验对照组的参与者。本报告中的所有患者年龄均≥18岁,且即将开始首个含阿霉素的癌症治疗方案。
在患者接受首个基于阿霉素的化疗治疗前评估的恶心预期,被发现是后续恶心的一个强有力的预测指标,实际上比先前报告的预测因素更强,包括年龄、孕期恶心和晕动病易感性。认为自己“很可能”会因化疗出现严重恶心的女性,出现严重恶心的可能性是认为其发生“极不可能”的患者的五倍。
有必要进一步开展研究,证实恶心预期是一个风险因素,同时也需要研究修改止吐治疗指南以考虑症状预期对患者生活质量的益处。最后,应制定并研究旨在降低患者恶心预期或提高其对恶心控制预期的符合伦理的干预措施。