Biegert Claudia, Wagner Irmela, Lüdtke Rainer, Kötter Ina, Lohmüller Claudia, Günaydin Ilhan, Taxis Katja, Heide Lutz
Pharmaceutical Institute, Eberhard Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
J Rheumatol. 2004 Nov;31(11):2121-30.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of a standardized willow bark extract in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We studied 127 outpatients with hip or knee OA and a WOMAC pain score of at least 30 mm and 26 outpatients with active RA in 2 randomized, controlled, double-blind trials with followup for 6 weeks. OA trial: Patients were randomized to receive willow bark extract, corresponding to 240 mg of salicin/day, diclofenac 100 mg/day, or placebo (n = 43, 43, and 41, respectively). Main outcome measure was the pain subscore of the WOMAC OA Index. RA trial: Patients were randomized to receive willow bark extract, corresponding to 240 mg salicin/day (n = 13) or placebo (n = 13). Main outcome measure was the patient's assessment of pain rated on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
OA trial: WOMAC pain scores decreased by 8 mm (17%) in the willow bark group and by 23 mm (47%) in the diclofenac group, compared with 5 mm (10%) in the placebo group. The difference between willow bark extract and placebo was not statistically significant (-2.8 mm; 95% CI -12.1 to 6.4 mm; p = 0.55, ANCOVA), but the difference between diclofenac and placebo was highly significant (-18.0 mm; 95% CI -27.2 to -8.8 mm; p = 0.0002, ANCOVA). RA trial: The mean reduction of pain on the VAS was -8 mm (15%) in the willow bark group compared with -2 mm (4%) in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant (estimated difference -0.8 mm; 95% CI -20.9 to 19.3 mm; p = 0.93, ANCOVA).
The OA study suggested that the willow bark extract showed no relevant efficacy in patients with OA. Similarly, the RA trial did not indicate efficacy of this extract in patients with RA.
研究标准化柳树皮提取物对骨关节炎(OA)和类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效及安全性。
在两项随机、对照、双盲试验中,我们对127例髋部或膝部OA且WOMAC疼痛评分至少为30 mm的门诊患者以及26例活动期RA门诊患者进行了为期6周的随访研究。OA试验:患者被随机分为三组,分别接受相当于240 mg水杨苷/天的柳树皮提取物、100 mg/天双氯芬酸或安慰剂(每组分别为43例、43例和41例)。主要结局指标为WOMAC OA指数的疼痛子评分。RA试验:患者被随机分为两组,分别接受相当于240 mg水杨苷/天的柳树皮提取物(n = 13)或安慰剂(n = 13)。主要结局指标为患者在100 mm视觉模拟量表(VAS)上对疼痛的评估。
OA试验:柳树皮组WOMAC疼痛评分下降8 mm(17%),双氯芬酸组下降23 mm(47%),而安慰剂组下降5 mm(10%)。柳树皮提取物与安慰剂之间的差异无统计学意义(-2.8 mm;95%可信区间-12.1至6.4 mm;p = 0.55,协方差分析),但双氯芬酸与安慰剂之间的差异具有高度统计学意义(-18.0 mm;95%可信区间-27.2至-8.8 mm;p = 0.0002,协方差分析)。RA试验:柳树皮组VAS疼痛评分平均降低-8 mm(15%),安慰剂组降低-2 mm(4%)。差异无统计学意义(估计差异-0.8 mm;95%可信区间-20.9至19.3 mm;p = 0.93,协方差分析)。
OA研究表明柳树皮提取物对OA患者无显著疗效。同样,RA试验也未表明该提取物对RA患者有效。