• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布地奈德与福莫特罗联合治疗轻至中度持续性哮喘患者的经济学评价。

An economic evaluation of combination treatment with budesonide and formoterol in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

作者信息

Jönsson Bengt, Berggren Fredrik, Svensson Klas, O'Byrne Paul M

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Box 6501 Stockholm 11383, Sweden.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2004 Nov;98(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.005
PMID:15526817
Abstract

Patients with mild asthma may benefit from increasing their inhaled corticosteroid dose, adding a long-acting beta2-agonist, or both. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of these options. Patients aged > or = 12 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma (n = 1272) were randomised to twice-daily, double-blind treatment with budesonide 100 microg, budesonide 100 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg, budesonide 200 microg, or budesonide 200 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg for 12 months. Clinical variables included lung function, number of symptom-free days and number of severe exacerbations. Data on medication use, hospitalisation, visits to health professionals and time off work due to asthma were combined with Swedish unit cost data (1999) to estimate the mean annual cost per patient. Budesonide 200 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg had the greatest efficacy and effectiveness. Budesonide 200 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg was both more effective and less costly than budesonide 100 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg, so a cost-effectiveness ratio was not calculated for this comparison. The cost-effectiveness ratio for budesonide 200 microg plus formoterol 4.5 microg compared with budesonide 200 microg alone was SEK 21 per symptom-free days gained. The combination of budesonide and formoterol in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma improved effectiveness at modest additional cost.

摘要

轻度哮喘患者增加吸入性糖皮质激素剂量、添加长效β2受体激动剂或两者并用可能有益。本研究评估了这些方案的成本效益。年龄≥12岁的轻至中度持续性哮喘患者(n = 1272)被随机分为每日两次接受布地奈德100微克、布地奈德100微克加福莫特罗4.5微克、布地奈德200微克或布地奈德200微克加福莫特罗4.5微克的双盲治疗,为期12个月。临床变量包括肺功能、无症状天数和严重加重发作次数。将药物使用、住院、就诊于医疗专业人员以及因哮喘误工时间的数据与瑞典单位成本数据(1999年)相结合,以估算每位患者的年均成本。布地奈德200微克加福莫特罗4.5微克具有最大的疗效和有效性。布地奈德200微克加福莫特罗4.5微克比布地奈德100微克加福莫特罗4.5微克更有效且成本更低,因此未计算该比较的成本效益比。布地奈德200微克加福莫特罗4.5微克与单独使用布地奈德200微克相比,每增加一个无症状天数的成本效益比为21瑞典克朗。在轻至中度持续性哮喘中,布地奈德与福莫特罗联用在适度增加成本的情况下提高了有效性。

相似文献

1
An economic evaluation of combination treatment with budesonide and formoterol in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.布地奈德与福莫特罗联合治疗轻至中度持续性哮喘患者的经济学评价。
Respir Med. 2004 Nov;98(11):1146-54. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.005.
2
Maintenance plus reliever budesonide/formoterol compared with a higher maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol plus formoterol as reliever in asthma: an efficacy and cost-effectiveness study.布地奈德/福莫特罗维持加缓解治疗与更高维持剂量布地奈德/福莫特罗加福莫特罗作为哮喘缓解治疗的疗效和成本效益研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):809-21. doi: 10.1185/030079906X100212.
3
An economic evaluation of adjustable and fixed dosing with budesonide/formoterol via a single inhaler in asthma patients: the ASSURE study.布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器可变剂量与固定剂量治疗哮喘患者的经济学评价:ASSURE研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Oct;20(10):1671-9. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5409.
4
Cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever asthma therapy.布地奈德/福莫特罗用于哮喘维持和缓解治疗的成本效益
Allergy. 2007 Oct;62(10):1189-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01466.x.
5
Cost-effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever asthma therapy in Denmark--cost-effectiveness analysis based on five randomised controlled trials.布地奈德/福莫特罗用于丹麦哮喘维持和缓解治疗的成本效益——基于五项随机对照试验的成本效益分析
Clin Respir J. 2009 Jul;3(3):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-699X.2009.00134.x.
6
Cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy versus salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol in the treatment of asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗用于维持和缓解治疗与沙美特罗/氟替卡松加沙丁胺醇治疗哮喘的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):695-708. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624070-00008.
7
Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial.布地奈德福莫特罗单剂量吸入器治疗成人和青少年中重度哮喘的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验
Drugs. 2006;66(17):2235-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666170-00006.
8
Cost effectiveness of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in COPD in four Nordic countries.在四个北欧国家,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,在噻托溴铵基础上加用布地奈德/福莫特罗的成本效益分析。
Respir Med. 2013 Nov;107(11):1709-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
9
Adding formoterol to budesonide in moderate asthma--health economic results from the FACET study.
Respir Med. 2001 Jun;95(6):505-12. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1078.
10
Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group.吸入用福莫特罗和布地奈德对哮喘急性加重的影响。福莫特罗与皮质类固醇确立疗法(FACET)国际研究小组。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1405-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711133372001.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhaled steroids with and without regular formoterol for asthma: serious adverse events.吸入性类固醇联合或不联合常规福莫特罗治疗哮喘:严重不良事件
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 25;9(9):CD006924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006924.pub4.
2
Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与抗白三烯药物加用吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 24;2014(1):CD003137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003137.pub5.
3
Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.
在成人和儿童复发性和/或慢性哮喘的管理中,抗白三烯药物与吸入性糖皮质激素的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD002314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002314.pub3.
4
A systematic review of economic evaluations of therapy in asthma.哮喘治疗经济学评价的系统评价。
J Asthma Allergy. 2010 Aug 13;3:33-42. doi: 10.2147/jaa.s11038.
5
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults and children.对于未使用过类固醇的成人和儿童持续性哮喘,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.pub2.
6
A retrospective database study comparing treatment outcomes and cost associated with choice of fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonists for asthma maintenance treatment in Germany.一项回顾性数据库研究,比较德国用于哮喘维持治疗的固定剂量吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β受体激动剂的选择所带来的治疗效果和成本。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;62(12):1870-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01895.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
7
Single-inhaler combination therapy for asthma: a review of cost effectiveness.哮喘的单吸入器联合疗法:成本效益综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(10):971-88. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624100-00005.
8
Cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy versus salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol in the treatment of asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗用于维持和缓解治疗与沙美特罗/氟替卡松加沙丁胺醇治疗哮喘的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(7):695-708. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624070-00008.