Suppr超能文献

在四个北欧国家,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,在噻托溴铵基础上加用布地奈德/福莫特罗的成本效益分析。

Cost effectiveness of adding budesonide/formoterol to tiotropium in COPD in four Nordic countries.

作者信息

Nielsen Rune, Kankaanranta Hannu, Bjermer Leif, Lange Peter, Arnetorp Sofie, Hedegaard Morten, Stenling Anna, Mittmann Nicole

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 65, N-5021 Bergen, Norway; Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2013 Nov;107(11):1709-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess the cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) Turbuhaler(®)+tiotropium (TIO) HandiHaler(®) vs. placebo (PBO)+TIO in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) eligible for inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABA).

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on the 12-week, randomised, double-blind CLIMB trial. The study included 659 patients with pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s ≤ 50% and ≥1 exacerbation requiring systemic glucocorticosteroids or antibiotics the preceding year. Patients received BUD/FORM 320/9 μg bid + TIO 18 μg qd or PBO bid + TIO 18 μg qd. Effectiveness was defined as the number of severe exacerbations (hospitalisation/emergency room visit/systemic glucocorticosteroids) avoided. A sub-analysis included antibiotics in the definition of an exacerbation. Resource use from CLIMB was combined with Danish (DKK), Finnish (€), Norwegian (NOK) and Swedish (SEK) unit costs (2010). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for BUD/FORM + TIO vs. PBO + TIO were estimated using descriptive statistics and uncertainty around estimates using bootstrapping. Analyses were conducted from the societal and healthcare perspectives in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.

RESULTS

From a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at €174/severe exacerbation avoided in Finland while BUD/FORM + TIO was dominant in the other countries. From the healthcare perspective, ICERs were DKK 1580 (€212), €307 and SEK 1573 (€165) per severe exacerbation avoided for Denmark, Finland and Sweden, respectively, while BUD/FORM + TIO was dominant in Norway. Including antibiotics decreased ICERs by 8-15%. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were overall robust.

CONCLUSION

BUD/FORM + TIO represents a clinical and economic benefit to health systems and society for the treatment of COPD in the Nordic countries. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00496470).

摘要

目的

评估布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FORM)都保®联合噻托溴铵(TIO)吸乐®对比安慰剂(PBO)联合TIO用于符合吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗条件的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的成本效益。

方法

成本效益分析基于为期12周的随机双盲CLIMB试验。该研究纳入了659例支气管扩张剂使用前1秒用力呼气容积≤50%且前一年有≥1次需要全身使用糖皮质激素或抗生素的加重发作的患者。患者接受BUD/FORM 320/9μg bid + TIO 18μg qd或PBO bid + TIO 18μg qd治疗。有效性定义为避免的严重加重发作(住院/急诊就诊/全身使用糖皮质激素)次数。一项亚分析将抗生素纳入加重发作的定义中。CLIMB研究中的资源使用情况与丹麦(丹麦克朗)、芬兰(欧元)、挪威(挪威克朗)和瑞典(瑞典克朗)的单位成本(2010年)相结合。使用描述性统计方法估计BUD/FORM + TIO对比PBO + TIO的增量成本效益比(ICER),并通过自抽样法评估估计值的不确定性。从丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的社会和医疗保健角度进行分析。

结果

从社会角度来看,芬兰避免每例严重加重发作的ICER估计为174欧元,而在其他国家BUD/FORM + TIO具有优势。从医疗保健角度来看,丹麦、芬兰和瑞典避免每例严重加重发作的ICER分别为1580丹麦克朗(212欧元)、307欧元和1573瑞典克朗(165欧元),而在挪威BUD/FORM + TIO具有优势。将抗生素纳入计算后,ICER降低了8 - 15%。敏感性分析表明结果总体稳健。

结论

对于北欧国家的卫生系统和社会而言,BUD/FORM + TIO在治疗COPD方面具有临床和经济效益。(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00496470)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验