• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚的药品补贴:流程与挑战。

The subsidy of pharmaceuticals in Australia: processes and challenges.

作者信息

Sansom Lloyd

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, South Australia.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):194-205. doi: 10.1071/ah040194.

DOI:10.1071/ah040194
PMID:15527399
Abstract

The increasing costs of health care, including new technologies and pharmaceuticals, pose challenges for all countries both in the developed and the developing world. It is essential that the increased expenditure on pharmaceuticals represents value for money and is seen as an investment in health care rather than simply the purchase of the latest released agent. The system in Australia uses a cost-effectiveness approach to guide the decisions as to whether a new drug can be recommended for subsidy. The need for a greater understanding and transparency of the processes is essential in order for a well-informed public debate to occur about the challenges to the system and its sustainability. The relevant issues are discussed in this article to assist that debate.

摘要

医疗保健成本不断上升,包括新技术和药品,这给发达国家和发展中国家都带来了挑战。药品支出的增加必须物有所值,应被视为对医疗保健的投资,而不仅仅是购买最新上市的药物。澳大利亚的系统采用成本效益方法来指导关于是否推荐新药进行补贴的决策。为了就该系统面临的挑战及其可持续性进行明智的公众辩论,必须更好地理解这些流程并提高透明度。本文将讨论相关问题以推动这一辩论。

相似文献

1
The subsidy of pharmaceuticals in Australia: processes and challenges.澳大利亚的药品补贴:流程与挑战。
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):194-205. doi: 10.1071/ah040194.
2
Tailoring access to high cost, genetically targeted drugs.定制高成本基因靶向药物的获取方式。
Med J Aust. 2005 Jun 20;182(12):607-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06844.x.
3
A cost-effectiveness approach to drug subsidy and pricing in Australia.澳大利亚药物补贴与定价的成本效益方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):104-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.104.
4
Dilemmas in regulation of the market for pharmaceuticals.药品市场监管中的困境。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):31-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.31.
5
Patient assistance programs: information is not our enemy.患者援助计划:信息并非我们的敌人。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):843-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.843.
6
"Tough but fair"? The active management of the New Zealand drug benefits scheme by an independent Crown agency.“严格但公正”?新西兰药品福利计划由独立的皇家机构进行积极管理。
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):171-81. doi: 10.1071/ah040171.
7
Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.药品与媒体:澳大利亚政府推荐报销药品的新闻报道。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 21;13:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-489.
8
Patient access to pharmaceuticals: an international comparison.患者获取药品情况:一项国际比较
Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Sep;8(3):253-66. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0028-z. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
9
Australia's 'free-ride' in pharmaceuticals: can it last?澳大利亚在药品方面的“搭便车”现象:能持续下去吗?
Aust Health Rev. 1996;19(1):81-94. doi: 10.1071/ah960081.
10
Are Australians able to access new medicines on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme in a more or less timely manner? An analysis of pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee recommendations, 1999-2003.澳大利亚人能否在药品福利计划下或多或少及时获取新药?对1999年至2003年药品福利咨询委员会建议的分析。
Value Health. 2006 Jul-Aug;9(4):205-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00104.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient access schemes in Asia-pacific markets: current experience and future potential.亚太市场的患者准入计划:当前经验与未来潜力
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015 Feb 16;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-014-0019-x. eCollection 2015.
2
Costs of medicines and health care: a concern for Australian women across the ages.药品和医疗保健费用:澳大利亚各年龄段女性关注的问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 20;13:484. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-484.
3
Promoting the consumer voice in palliative care: exploring the possibility of using consumer impact statements.
在姑息治疗中提升患者声音:探索使用患者影响陈述的可能性。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):653-60. doi: 10.1111/hex.12118. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
4
Medicines and the media: news reports of medicines recommended for government reimbursement in Australia.药品与媒体:澳大利亚政府推荐报销药品的新闻报道。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 21;13:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-489.
5
A 3-dimensional view of access to licensed and subsidized medicines under single-payer systems in the US, the UK, Australia and New Zealand.美国、英国、澳大利亚和新西兰的单一支付方制度下,许可和补贴药品获取的三维视图。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Nov 1;30(11):1051-65. doi: 10.2165/11595270-000000000-00000.
6
Hospital drug and therapeutics committees in Australia: is there a role for economic evaluation at the institutional level?澳大利亚医院药物和治疗学委员会:在机构层面上进行经济评估是否有作用?
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Dec;33(6):895-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9565-3.
7
Access to high cost medicines in Australia: ethical perspectives.澳大利亚高价药品的获取:伦理视角
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008 May 19;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-5-4.
8
The views of stakeholders on controlled access schemes for high-cost antirheumatic biological medicines in Australia.澳大利亚利益相关者对高成本抗风湿生物药物的受控获取计划的看法。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Dec 20;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-26.
9
Challenges for Australia's Bio/Nanopharma Policies: trade deals, public goods and reference pricing in sustainable industrial renewal.澳大利亚生物/纳米制药政策面临的挑战:可持续产业复兴中的贸易协定、公共产品与参考定价
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 1;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-9.
10
The funding and use of high-cost medicines in Australia: the example of anti-rheumatic biological medicines.澳大利亚高成本药品的资金投入与使用:以抗风湿生物药为例。
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Mar 1;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-2.