• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对自身冠心病风险的看法、担忧及期望:一级预防的障碍

Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention.

作者信息

van Steenkiste Ben, van der Weijden Trudy, Timmermans Daniëlle, Vaes Jaqueline, Stoffers Jelle, Grol Richard

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Centre for Quality of Care Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005
PMID:15530768
Abstract

The application of cardiovascular guidelines and risk tables may be impeded by many barriers. In the present paper, we explored the role of patients in the feasibility of cardiovascular preventive care in general practice. Patient-related barriers were examined by means of a qualitative study. Fifteen GPs audio-taped one or two consultations on primary cardiovascular preventive care. The tapes were used to guide the subsequent semi-structured in-depth interviews with patients. Twenty-two patients were interviewed. Patients' understanding of prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was often insufficient. The risk table and the multi-factorial approach were difficult to understand. Risk perception was often unrealistic and dichotomous, and mainly based on personal experiences. There was a demand for more information and cholesterol tests. At the patient level, many barriers impede effective prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the highly individualized high-risk approach needs to be explained to patients. Educational patient materials, intended to support both the GP and the patient, should take into account the ideas, fears and expectations of patients.

摘要

心血管指南和风险表的应用可能受到许多障碍的阻碍。在本文中,我们探讨了患者在全科医疗中进行心血管预防保健可行性方面的作用。通过定性研究对与患者相关的障碍进行了调查。15名全科医生录制了一到两次关于原发性心血管预防保健的会诊。这些录音带被用于指导随后对患者进行的半结构化深入访谈。对22名患者进行了访谈。患者对心血管疾病(CVD)预防的理解往往不足。风险表和多因素方法难以理解。风险认知往往不现实且过于简单化,主要基于个人经验。患者对更多信息和胆固醇检测有需求。在患者层面,许多障碍阻碍了心血管疾病的有效预防。特别是,需要向患者解释高度个体化的高风险方法。旨在支持全科医生和患者的教育性患者材料应考虑到患者的想法、恐惧和期望。

相似文献

1
Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention.患者对自身冠心病风险的看法、担忧及期望:一级预防的障碍
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Nov;55(2):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.005.
2
Cardiovascular-risk patients' experienced benefits and unfulfilled expectations from preventive consultations: a qualitative study.心血管疾病风险患者从预防性咨询中获得的益处及未满足的期望:一项定性研究
Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(5):315-25.
3
Patients' responsiveness to a decision support tool for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in primary care.患者对基层医疗中心血管疾病一级预防决策支持工具的反应性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jul;72(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
4
Women's views of optimal risk communication and decision making in general practice consultations about the menopause and hormone replacement therapy.女性对更年期及激素替代疗法全科诊疗中最佳风险沟通与决策的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 May;53(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.11.001.
5
Assessing family history of heart disease in primary care consultations: a qualitative study.在初级保健会诊中评估心脏病家族史:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):435-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm037. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
6
Improving cardiovascular risk management: a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a decision support tool for patients and physicians.改善心血管疾病风险管理:一项关于患者和医生决策支持工具效果的随机对照试验。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Feb;14(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000239475.71805.1e.
7
Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases by lipid-lowering treatment in German general practice: results from GPs ignoring guidelines and risk calculators.德国全科医疗中通过降脂治疗进行心血管疾病的一级预防:全科医生忽视指南和风险计算器的结果。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2007;13(1):27-34. doi: 10.1080/13814780601050541.
8
Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries.老年人对参与自身护理的偏好:一项针对11个欧洲国家初级卫生保健的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
9
The complexity of patient participation: lessons learned from patients' illness narratives.患者参与的复杂性:从患者的疾病叙述中汲取的经验教训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
10
Elderly patients' and GPs' views on different methods for patient involvement: an international qualitative interview study.老年患者及全科医生对患者参与的不同方法的看法:一项国际质性访谈研究。
Fam Pract. 2005 Apr;22(2):184-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh733. Epub 2005 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
2
Evaluating modifiable hypertension risk in Nigerian adults-The Nigerian diet risk score.评估尼日利亚成年人中可改变的高血压风险——尼日利亚饮食风险评分
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Apr;30(4):260-272. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14089. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Factors influencing the implementation of cardiovascular risk scoring in primary care: a mixed-method systematic review.
影响基层医疗中心血管风险评分实施的因素:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01022-x.
4
Initiation and Single Dispensing in Cardiovascular and Insulin Medications: Prevalence and Explanatory Factors.心血管和胰岛素药物的起始用药和单次配药:流行情况和解释因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103358.
5
Improving cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative study.改善国民保健制度健康检查中心的心血管疾病风险沟通:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(8):e026058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026058.
6
A comprehensive guidelines-based approach reduces cardiovascular risk in everyday practice: the VARO study.基于综合指南的方法可降低日常实践中的心血管风险:VARO研究。
Arch Med Sci. 2017 Jun;13(4):705-710. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.64865. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
7
Global cardiovascular risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: systematic review of systematic reviews.成人心血管疾病一级预防中的全球心血管风险评估:系统评价的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e013650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013650.
8
Low use of statins for secondary prevention in primary care: a survey in a northern Swedish population.基层医疗中他汀类药物用于二级预防的使用率较低:瑞典北部人群的一项调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 11;17(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0505-0.
9
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology.预防心脏病学中的共同决策与患者赋权
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):49. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0729-6.
10
Knowledge and perceptions of risk for cardiovascular disease: Findings of a qualitative investigation from a low-income peri-urban community in the Western Cape, South Africa.心血管疾病风险的认知与观念:来自南非西开普省低收入城郊社区的定性调查结果
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015 Oct 22;7(1):891. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.891.