• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防心脏病学中的共同决策与患者赋权

Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology.

作者信息

Thiruvengadam Swetha Kambhampati, Ashvetiya Tamara, Stone Neil J, Blumenthal Roger S, Martin Seth S

机构信息

Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Carnegie 591, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

McGaw Medical Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):49. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0729-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-016-0729-6
PMID:27098670
Abstract

Shared decision-making, central to evidence-based medicine and good patient care, begins and ends with the patient. It is the process by which a clinician and a patient jointly make a health decision after discussing options, potential benefits and harms, and considering the patient's values and preferences. Patient empowerment is crucial to shared decision-making and occurs when a patient accepts responsibility for his or her health. They can then learn to solve their own problems with information and support from professionals. Patient empowerment begins with the provider acknowledging that patients are ultimately in control of their care and aims to increase a patient's capacity to think critically and make autonomous, informed decisions about their health. This article explores the various components of shared decision-making in scenarios such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia, heart failure, and diabetes. It explores barriers and the potential for improving medication adherence, disease awareness, and self-management of chronic disease.

摘要

共同决策是循证医学和优质患者护理的核心,始于患者,也终于患者。它是临床医生和患者在讨论各种选择、潜在益处和危害,并考虑患者的价值观和偏好之后,共同做出健康决策的过程。患者赋权对于共同决策至关重要,当患者对自己的健康承担责任时就会出现。然后,他们可以在专业人员的信息和支持下学会解决自己的问题。患者赋权始于医疗服务提供者承认患者最终掌控自己的护理,并旨在提高患者批判性思考的能力,以及就自身健康做出自主、明智决策的能力。本文探讨了高血压、高脂血症、心力衰竭和糖尿病等情况下共同决策的各个组成部分。它探讨了障碍以及改善药物依从性、疾病认知和慢性病自我管理的潜力。

相似文献

1
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Empowerment in Preventive Cardiology.预防心脏病学中的共同决策与患者赋权
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 May;18(5):49. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0729-6.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making.传达他汀类药物的证据以支持共同决策。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 6;17:41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0436-9.
4
Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?共同决策:临床医生需要了解什么,为什么他们应该关注?
Med J Aust. 2014 Jul 7;201(1):35-9. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00002.
5
Empowering diabetes management: The impact of patient-provider collaboration on type 2 diabetes outcomes through autonomy support and shared decision-making.增强糖尿病管理:患者与医护人员协作通过自主性支持和共同决策对2型糖尿病治疗结果的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Oct;127:108348. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108348. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
6
Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice.老年人心血管疾病药物治疗的共同决策:一般实践中患者体验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e026342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026342.
7
Shared Decision-Making as the Future of Emergency Cardiology.共同决策:急诊心脏病学的未来。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Feb;34(2):117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.患者参与医疗决策偏好的变异性:对决策支持工具使用的启示
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100034...
9
Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.关于筛查和化学预防的共同决策。美国预防服务工作组的建议方法。
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011.
10
Shared decision-making for older adults with cardiovascular disease.老年心血管病患者的共同决策。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):196-204. doi: 10.1002/clc.23267. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of an advanced nurse practitioner led menopause clinic on quality of life and menopausal symptoms.由高级执业护士主导的更年期诊所对生活质量和更年期症状的影响。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251324573. doi: 10.1177/17455057251324573. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Impact of visual presentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque on cardiovascular risk profile using mHealth technologies.使用移动健康技术评估动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉斑块的视觉呈现对心血管风险状况的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 22;8(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01423-y.
3
Effect of depression and empowerment on medication adherence in patients with breast cancer: a descriptive survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Lifestyle-Focused Text Messaging on Risk Factor Modification in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.生活方式为导向的短信对冠心病患者危险因素改善的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015;314(12):1255-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10945.
2
Empowerment, motivation, and medical adherence (EMMA): the feasibility of a program for patient-centered consultations to support medication adherence and blood glucose control in adults with type 2 diabetes.赋权、动机与医疗依从性(EMMA):一项以患者为中心的咨询项目在支持2型糖尿病成人患者药物依从性和血糖控制方面的可行性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 1;9:1243-53. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85528. eCollection 2015.
3
抑郁和赋权对乳腺癌患者药物依从性的影响:一项描述性调查。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 14;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02680-8.
4
A Qualitative Study of the Knowledge of Metabolic Syndrome, Attitudes about Lifestyle Modifications, and Preferences for Lifestyle Interventions among Patients with Cancer and Metabolic Syndrome.一项关于癌症合并代谢综合征患者对代谢综合征的认知、对生活方式改变的态度以及对生活方式干预偏好的定性研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;16(18):3147. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183147.
5
Treatment expectations of patients and clinicians: a cross-sectional study.患者与临床医生的治疗期望:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 22;15:1447405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1447405. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploration of experiences and attitudes associated with lung health promotion among Black males with a history of smoking.对有吸烟史的黑人男性在肺部健康促进方面的经历和态度的探索。
J Mens Health. 2024 Jan;20(1):20-34. doi: 10.22514/jomh.2024.005. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
7
Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:关注伦理问题,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01066-4.
8
A systematic review of reviews on the advantages of mHealth utilization in mental health services: A viable option for large populations in low-resource settings.关于移动健康在心理健康服务中应用优势的综述之系统评价:资源匮乏地区广大人群的可行选择。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Apr 4;11:e43. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.39. eCollection 2024.
9
Linking Cardiac Psychology and Cardiovascular Medicine via Self-Determination Theory and Shared Decision-Making.通过自我决定理论和共同决策将心脏心理学与心血管医学联系起来。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Mar;32(1):111-120. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10014-8. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
10
Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions about the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study from a Virtual Community of Practice.医疗保健专业人员对基层医疗中实施共同决策的看法:一项来自虚拟实践社区的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Apr 16;24(2):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6554. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.
患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
4
Clinician-patient risk discussion for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: importance to implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines.临床医生与患者关于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防的风险讨论:对实施2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的重要性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.043.
5
Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review.移动健康慢性病管理对治疗依从性和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3951.
6
Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review.患者和医疗服务提供者对使用患者门户网站管理慢性病的态度:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 20;17(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3703.
7
The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.患者门户对质量结果的影响及其对有意义使用的启示:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 10;17(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171.
8
The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making.循证医学与共同决策之间的联系。
JAMA. 2014 Oct 1;312(13):1295-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10186.
9
Addressing statin adverse effects in the clinic: the 5 Ms.解决临床中的他汀类药物不良反应:5Ms 原则
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;19(6):533-42. doi: 10.1177/1074248414529622. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
10
Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view.支持60岁及以上患者收缩压目标低于150 mmHg的证据:少数观点。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 1;160(7):499-503. doi: 10.7326/M13-2981.