Stone Michael A, Moore Brian C J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2311-23. doi: 10.1121/1.1784447.
Using a cochlear implant simulator, Stone and Moore [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1023-1034 (2003)] reported that wideband fast-acting compression led to poorer intelligibility than slow-acting compression in a competing speech task. Compression speed was varied by using different pairs of attack and release times. In the first experiment reported here, it is shown that attack times less than about 2 ms in a wideband compressor are deleterious to intelligibility. In experiment 2, fast wideband compression was applied to the target and background either before or after mixing. The former reduced the modulation depth of each signal but maintained the independence between the two signals, while the latter introduced "comodulation." Using simulations with 6 and 11 channels, intelligibility was higher when compression was applied before mixing. In experiment 3, wideband compression was compared with multichannel compression; the latter led to reduced comodulation effects. For 6 channels, the position of the compressor, either wideband or within each channel, had no effect on intelligibility. For 11 channels, channel compression severely degraded intelligibility compared to wideband compression, presumably because of the greater reduction of across-channel contrasts. Overall, caution appears necessary in the use of fast-acting compression in cochlear implants, so as to preserve intelligibility.
斯通和摩尔[《美国声学学会杂志》114, 1023 - 1034 (2003)]使用人工耳蜗模拟器报告称,在竞争性言语任务中,宽带快速作用压缩比慢速作用压缩导致的可懂度更低。通过使用不同的起始时间和释放时间对来改变压缩速度。在本文所报告的第一个实验中,结果表明宽带压缩器中起始时间小于约2毫秒对可懂度有害。在实验2中,在混合之前或之后对目标信号和背景信号应用快速宽带压缩。前者降低了每个信号的调制深度,但保持了两个信号之间的独立性,而后者引入了“共调制”。通过6通道和11通道的模拟,在混合之前应用压缩时可懂度更高。在实验3中,将宽带压缩与多通道压缩进行了比较;后者导致共调制效应降低。对于6通道,压缩器的位置,无论是宽带的还是在每个通道内,对可懂度都没有影响。对于11通道,与宽带压缩相比,通道压缩严重降低了可懂度,大概是因为跨通道对比度的更大降低。总体而言,在人工耳蜗中使用快速作用压缩时似乎有必要谨慎,以保持可懂度。