Windle Richard, Dillon Harvey, Heinrich Antje
Audiology Department, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, United Kingdom.
NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1122420. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122420. eCollection 2023.
Throughout our adult lives there is a decline in peripheral hearing, auditory processing and elements of cognition that support listening ability. Audiometry provides no information about the status of auditory processing and cognition, and older adults often struggle with complex listening situations, such as speech in noise perception, even if their peripheral hearing appears normal. Hearing aids can address some aspects of peripheral hearing impairment and improve signal-to-noise ratios. However, they cannot directly enhance central processes and may introduce distortion to sound that might act to undermine listening ability. This review paper highlights the need to consider the distortion introduced by hearing aids, specifically when considering normally-ageing older adults. We focus on patients with age-related hearing loss because they represent the vast majority of the population attending audiology clinics. We believe that it is important to recognize that the combination of peripheral and central, auditory and cognitive decline make older adults some of the most complex patients seen in audiology services, so they should not be treated as "standard" despite the high prevalence of age-related hearing loss. We argue that a primary concern should be to avoid hearing aid settings that introduce distortion to speech envelope cues, which is not a new concept. The primary cause of distortion is the speed and range of change to hearing aid amplification (i.e., compression). We argue that slow-acting compression should be considered as a default for some users and that other advanced features should be reconsidered as they may also introduce distortion that some users may not be able to tolerate. We discuss how this can be incorporated into a pragmatic approach to hearing aid fitting that does not require increased loading on audiology services.
在我们整个成年生活中,外周听力、听觉处理以及支持听力的认知要素都会下降。听力测定无法提供有关听觉处理和认知状态的信息,而且即使外周听力看似正常,老年人在面对复杂的听力情境时,比如在噪声环境中感知言语,往往也会感到困难。助听器可以解决外周听力损伤的一些问题,并提高信噪比。然而,它们无法直接增强中枢处理能力,而且可能会引入声音失真,这可能会损害听力。这篇综述文章强调了考虑助听器引入的失真的必要性,特别是在考虑正常衰老的老年人时。我们关注年龄相关性听力损失患者,因为他们占就诊于听力诊所人群的绝大多数。我们认为,认识到外周和中枢、听觉和认知衰退的综合作用使老年人成为听力服务中最复杂的患者群体之一很重要,所以尽管年龄相关性听力损失患病率很高,也不应将他们视为“标准”患者。我们认为主要关注点应该是避免助听器设置对外周言语线索引入失真,这并不是一个新概念。失真的主要原因是助听器放大(即压缩)的速度和变化范围。我们认为对于一些用户,应将慢作用压缩作为默认设置,并且其他高级功能也应重新考虑,因为它们也可能引入一些用户无法耐受的失真。我们讨论了如何将这一点纳入一种实用的助听器验配方法中,而这并不需要增加听力服务的负担。