Rycroft-Malone Jo, Harvey Gill, Seers Kate, Kitson Alison, McCormack Brendan, Titchen Angie
Royal College of Nursing Institute, Oxford, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Nov;13(8):913-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x.
The challenges of implementing evidence-based practice are complex and varied. Against this background a framework has been developed to represent the multiple factors that may influence the implementation of evidence into practice. It is proposed that successful implementation is dependent upon the nature of the evidence being used, the quality of context, and, the type of facilitation required to enable the change process. This study sets out to scrutinize the elements of the framework through empirical enquiry.
The aim of the study was to address the following questions: * What factors do practitioners identify as the most important in enabling implementation of evidence into practice? * What are the factors practitioners identify that mediate the implementation of evidence into practice? * Do the concepts of evidence, context and facilitation constitute the key elements of a framework for getting evidence into practice?
The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1: Exploratory focus groups (n = 2) were conducted to inform the development of an interview guide. This was used with individual key informants in case study sites. Phase 2: Two sites with on-going or recent implementation projects were studied. Within sites semi-structured interviews were conducted (n = 17).
A number of key issues in relation to the implementation of evidence into practice emerged including: the nature and role of evidence, relevance and fit with organizational and practice issues, multi-professional relationships and collaboration, role of the project lead and resources.
The results are discussed with reference to the wider literature and in relation to the on-going development of the framework. Crucially the growing body of evidence reveals that a focus on individual approaches to implementing evidence-based practice, such as skilling-up practitioners to appraise research evidence, will be ineffective by themselves.
Key elements that require attention in implementing evidence into practice are presented and may provide a useful checklist for future implementation and evaluation projects.
实施循证实践面临的挑战复杂多样。在此背景下,已开发出一个框架来呈现可能影响将证据应用于实践的多种因素。有人提出,成功实施取决于所使用证据的性质、背景质量以及促成变革过程所需的促进类型。本研究旨在通过实证调查来审视该框架的要素。
本研究旨在解决以下问题:
从业者认为哪些因素对将证据应用于实践最为重要?
从业者认为哪些因素会影响证据在实践中的应用?
证据、背景和促进这些概念是否构成将证据应用于实践的框架的关键要素?
本研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段:开展探索性焦点小组(n = 2)以指导访谈指南的制定。该指南用于对案例研究地点的关键信息提供者进行单独访谈。第二阶段:对两个正在进行或近期有实施项目的地点进行研究。在各地点进行了半结构化访谈(n = 17)。
出现了一些与将证据应用于实践相关的关键问题,包括:证据的性质和作用、与组织及实践问题的相关性和契合度、多专业关系与协作、项目负责人的角色以及资源。
结合更广泛的文献以及该框架的持续发展对结果进行了讨论。至关重要的是,越来越多的证据表明,仅关注个人实施循证实践的方法,比如提升从业者评估研究证据的技能,其本身是无效的。
提出了在将证据应用于实践时需要关注的关键要素,可能为未来的实施和评估项目提供有用的清单。