• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区法医精神卫生服务的临床特征。

Clinical characteristics of community forensic mental health services.

作者信息

Mohan Rajesh, Slade Mike, Fahy Tom A

机构信息

Section of Forensic Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, P.O. Box 25, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1294-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1294.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1294
PMID:15534019
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Community forensic mental health teams are a new service within the widening range of specialized community mental health services. The characteristics of these novel services are poorly defined. Two commonly described service models in the United Kingdom are the integrated model (forensic specialists working within community mental health teams) and the parallel model (forensic specialists working on a separate specialist team). The study reported here aimed to establish clear definitions of these service models.

METHODS

A literature review and a focus group of ten service professionals were conducted to identify candidate characteristics of services in community forensic mental health teams. A total of 31 characteristics were identified and used to prepare the first-round questionnaire for the two rounds of a modified Delphi consultation, which is an expert opinion and consensus method, with a multidisciplinary panel of 32 mental health professionals experienced in community forensic work.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine staff (91 percent) completed the two rounds of consultation. Thirteen service characteristics differentiated the integrated and parallel models. Key characteristics of parallel teams included having their own team base, separate referral meetings, a specialist management line, specialist supervision, protected funding, forensic psychology, good links with criminal justice systems, and capped caseloads. Integrated teams were distinguished by their close links with community mental health services and acceptance of more referrals from primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated and parallel models of community forensic mental health teams differ on many service characteristics. Defining these characteristics will help in researching the pros and cons of each model in the treatment and risk management of mentally ill offenders in the community.

摘要

目的

社区法医精神卫生团队是不断扩大的专业社区精神卫生服务范围内的一项新服务。这些新型服务的特点界定不清。英国通常描述的两种服务模式是整合模式(法医专家在社区精神卫生团队中工作)和平行模式(法医专家在单独的专业团队中工作)。本文报告的研究旨在明确这些服务模式的定义。

方法

进行了文献综述,并组织了一个由十名服务专业人员组成的焦点小组,以确定社区法医精神卫生团队服务的候选特征。共确定了31个特征,并用于为两轮改良德尔菲咨询编制第一轮问卷,这是一种专家意见和共识方法,由32名在社区法医工作方面经验丰富的多学科精神卫生专业人员组成小组。

结果

29名工作人员(91%)完成了两轮咨询。13个服务特征区分了整合模式和平行模式。平行团队的关键特征包括拥有自己的团队基地、单独的转诊会议、专门的管理线路、专门的监督、专项资金、法医心理学、与刑事司法系统的良好联系以及限定的工作量。整合团队的特点是与社区精神卫生服务紧密相连,并接受更多来自初级保健机构的转诊。

结论

社区法医精神卫生团队的整合模式和平行模式在许多服务特征上存在差异。明确这些特征将有助于研究每种模式在社区中对精神病罪犯的治疗和风险管理中的优缺点。

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics of community forensic mental health services.社区法医精神卫生服务的临床特征。
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1294-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1294.
2
New models of collaboration between criminal justice and mental health systems.刑事司法系统与心理健康系统之间合作的新模式。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1211-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050670.
3
Forensic assertive community treatment: preventing incarceration of adults with severe mental illness.法医积极社区治疗:防止重度精神疾病成年人被监禁。
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Nov;55(11):1285-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.11.1285.
4
Providing mental health services to adult offenders in Victoria, Australia: overcoming barriers.为澳大利亚维多利亚州成年罪犯提供心理健康服务:克服障碍
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(6):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
5
Extending Assertive Community Treatment to criminal justice settings: origins, current evidence, and future directions.将积极社区治疗扩展至刑事司法环境:起源、当前证据及未来方向。
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Oct;43(5):527-44. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9092-9. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
6
The organization of the psychiatric service and criminality committed by the mentally ill.精神科服务的组织与精神病患者实施的犯罪行为
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(6):401-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
7
Beyond specialist programmes: a study of the needs of offenders with intellectual disability requiring psychiatric attention.超越专科项目:对需要精神科关注的智力残疾罪犯需求的研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Sep;48(Pt 6):591-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00628.x.
8
Efficacy of a Mental Health Treatment Court with assertive community treatment.心理健康治疗法庭与积极社区治疗的疗效。
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):199-214. doi: 10.1002/bsl.638.
9
Specialist forensic mental health services.专业法医精神卫生服务。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14(2 Suppl):S19-24.
10
Criminal and civil community-based "detention": some parallels.基于社区的刑事和民事“拘留”:一些相似之处。
J Law Med. 2005 May;12(4):462-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Optimal Post-prison Care for Those With Psychosis: A Delphi Study.为精神病患者确定最佳出狱后护理方案:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 22;12:760904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760904. eCollection 2021.
2
Defining outcome measures of hospitalization for assessment in the Japanese forensic mental health scheme: a Delphi study.定义日本法医精神卫生计划中住院评估的结果衡量标准:一项德尔菲研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Jan 28;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-9-7. eCollection 2015.