• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为精神病患者确定最佳出狱后护理方案:一项德尔菲研究。

Defining Optimal Post-prison Care for Those With Psychosis: A Delphi Study.

作者信息

Simpson Paul L, Settumba Stella, Adily Armita, Ton Bianca, Butler Tony

机构信息

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 22;12:760904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760904. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760904
PMID:34744842
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8569300/
Abstract

Early treatment (considered as early contact with community mental health services) and treatment retention are associated with reduced reoffending among those with a previous diagnosis of psychosis, yet the attributes of care required to best achieve this is largely unexplored for people with psychosis leaving prison. This study sought consensus from a sample of experts and consumers regarding the attributes of an "optimal model of care" for those with a prior episode of psychosis leaving prison in New South Wales, Australia. A Delphi method was used, which involved establishing a consensus from a panel of 25 experts and consumers. Following three meetings, 34 model of care attributes and 168 attribute levels were generated for two rounds of online scoring. All attributes and levels were included in the final model if they scored "very important" or "extremely important;" or if the attribute was agreed on by 70% or more of participants. The participant retention rate across scoring rounds was 96% for Round 1 and 84% for Round 2, where consensus was reached. Two "member checking" procedures were undertaken to enhance the integrity of findings: a model "stress test" and an online consumer poll. Thirty-two attributes and 72 attribute levels were included in the final model across four components: pre-release care planning and coordination; treatments in community; diversion from prison; and evaluation. Member checking endorsed a person-centered approach with carers and peer-support central to care. Participants agreed that an optimal model of care should involve a specialized team who works independent of community health service teams to directly deliver certain treatments and services while helping consumers to access external social an economic supports and services.

摘要

早期治疗(定义为尽早与社区心理健康服务机构接触)以及治疗依从性与降低曾被诊断为精神病患者的再犯罪率相关,但对于刚出狱的精神病患者而言,能最佳实现这一目标所需的护理属性在很大程度上尚未得到探索。本研究旨在就澳大利亚新南威尔士州刚出狱的曾有过精神病发作经历的患者的“最佳护理模式”属性,向专家和消费者样本征求意见。采用了德尔菲法,即从由25名专家和消费者组成的小组中达成共识。经过三次会议,针对两轮在线评分生成了34项护理模式属性和168个属性级别。如果所有属性和级别得分“非常重要”或“极其重要”;或者如果70%或更多参与者认可该属性,则将其纳入最终模型。在达成共识的评分轮次中,第一轮参与者保留率为96%,第二轮为84%。为提高研究结果的完整性,进行了两项“成员核查”程序:模型“压力测试”和在线消费者民意调查。最终模型涵盖四个组成部分中的32项属性和72个属性级别:释放前护理规划与协调;社区治疗;监狱分流;以及评估。成员核查认可了一种以患者为中心的方法,其中护理人员和同伴支持是护理的核心。参与者一致认为,最佳护理模式应包括一个专门团队,该团队独立于社区卫生服务团队开展工作,直接提供某些治疗和服务,同时帮助消费者获得外部社会和经济支持与服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/319c/8569300/65801728486a/fpsyt-12-760904-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/319c/8569300/65801728486a/fpsyt-12-760904-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/319c/8569300/65801728486a/fpsyt-12-760904-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining Optimal Post-prison Care for Those With Psychosis: A Delphi Study.为精神病患者确定最佳出狱后护理方案:一项德尔菲研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 22;12:760904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.760904. eCollection 2021.
2
Mental health service contact following release from prison or hospital discharge in those with psychosis.精神病患者出狱或出院后的心理健康服务接触情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 15;13:1034917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1034917. eCollection 2022.
3
Offering mental health first aid to a person experiencing psychosis: a Delphi study to redevelop the guidelines published in 2008.为出现精神病症状的人提供心理健康急救:重新制定 2008 年发布的指南的德尔菲研究。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00532-7.
4
First aid recommendations for psychosis: using the Delphi method to gain consensus between mental health consumers, carers, and clinicians.精神病急救建议:运用德尔菲法在精神健康消费者、护理人员和临床医生之间达成共识。
Schizophr Bull. 2008 May;34(3):435-43. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm099. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Mental health first aid for Indigenous Australians: using Delphi consensus studies to develop guidelines for culturally appropriate responses to mental health problems.澳大利亚原住民心理健康急救:利用德尔菲共识研究制定针对心理健康问题的文化适宜应对指南。
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Aug 3;9:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-47.
7
What should we know about dementia in the 21st century? A Delphi consensus study.关于21世纪的痴呆症我们应该了解什么?一项德尔菲共识研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Feb 6;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0008-1.
8
Services in the community for adults with psychosis and intellectual disabilities: a Delphi consultation of professionals' views.为患有精神病和智力残疾的成年人提供的社区服务:专业人士观点的德尔菲咨询
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Jul;53(7):677-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01146.x. Epub 2009 Jan 2.
9
Helping someone with problem drinking: mental health first aid guidelines - a Delphi expert consensus study.帮助有酗酒问题的人:心理健康急救指南 - 德尔菲专家共识研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 7;9:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-79.
10
Quality of Care in Ulcerative Colitis: A Modified Delphi Panel Approach.溃疡性结肠炎的医疗质量:一种改良的德尔菲专家小组方法。
Dig Dis. 2018;36(5):346-353. doi: 10.1159/000489845. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of quality assessment tool for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of real-world studies: a Delphi consensus survey.真实世界研究系统评价和荟萃分析质量评估工具的开发:德尔菲共识调查。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Jul;44(7):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05595-4. Epub 2024 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Reaching consensus on the principles of trauma-informed care in early intervention psychosis services: A Delphi study.创伤知情照护原则在早期精神病干预服务中达成共识:德尔菲研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;15(5):1369-1375. doi: 10.1111/eip.13068. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Association Between Early Contact With Mental Health Services After an Offense and Reoffending in Individuals Diagnosed With Psychosis.精神分裂症患者犯罪后早期接触心理健康服务与再犯罪的关系。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1137-1146. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1255.
3
Disengagement from mental health treatment and re-offending in those with psychosis: a multi-state model of linked data.
精神分裂症患者中断心理健康治疗与再犯罪:基于关联数据的多状态模型
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;55(12):1639-1648. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01873-1. Epub 2020 May 10.
4
Towards inclusive priority-setting for global health research projects: recommendations for sharing power with communities.面向全球卫生研究项目的包容性优先排序:与社区分享权力的建议。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jun 1;34(5):346-357. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz041.
5
Court diversion for those with psychosis and its impact on re-offending rates: results from a longitudinal data-linkage study.针对患有精神病者的法庭转处措施及其对再犯罪率的影响:一项纵向数据关联研究的结果
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e9. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.71.
6
Complex Interventions and Interorganisational Relationships: Examining Core Implementation Components of Assertive Community Treatment.复杂干预与组织间关系:审视积极社区治疗的核心实施要素
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Dec 6;18(4):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3547.
7
Guidelines for the public on how to provide mental health first aid: narrative review.关于公众如何提供心理健康急救的指南:叙述性综述
BJPsych Open. 2018 Oct 22;4(6):427-440. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.58. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?成员核对:一种增强可信度的工具还是仅仅是对验证的认可?
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
9
Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model.迈向以公平为导向的健康研究重点设定的深度包容:一个工作模型。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;151:215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research.在心理健康研究中运用德尔菲专家共识法。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97. doi: 10.1177/0004867415600891. Epub 2015 Aug 21.