Seegenschmiedt M H, Sauer R
Strahlentherapeutische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Strahlenther Onkol. 1992 Mar;168(3):119-40.
Internal methods of thermotherapy such as interstitial, endocavitary and perfusional hyperthermia in combination with high- (HDR) or low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy have gained increasing interest among oncologists due to the known radio- and chemosensitizing potential of heat. Interstitial techniques offer several advantages over percutaneous heating techniques: confined treatment volume with improved sparing of normal tissue; accessibility of deeper tumors in various sites; more homogeneous distribution of therapeutic temperatures; and better control and evaluation of thermal parameters, when using extensive "thermal mapping" procedures. Currently several promising techniques are investigated such as radiofrequency (RF), microwave (MW) and hot source (HS) techniques. In phase 1 to 2 studies interstitial hyperthermia (IHT) has been mostly applied in the head and neck and brain, the chest wall, the pelvic region and the extremities for primary advanced, persistent or local recurrent tumors, which have responded poorly to conventional treatment approaches. Preliminary data on 600 patients treated with interstitial thermo-radiotherapy (IHT-IRT) are extremely promising despite broad variations among the technical and clinical treatment parameters. The tumor response rate in various clinical trials ranges between 11% and 74% CR, and with respect of extensive pre-treatment approaches, the overall complication rate of 20% appears acceptable. So far several prognostic treatment factors have been identified: tumor volume; radiation dose; high minimum tumor temperatures and sufficiently good thermal quality of the hyperthermia treatment. Future technical innovations should broaden clinical implementations of interventional hyperthermia such as intraoperative hyperthermia and intracavitary hyperthermia. It would appear from these experiences, that interstitial hyperthermia is an effective and safe treatment modality, especially when combined with radiotherapy for tumor palliation. Prospective randomized multicentric studies have already been initiated to investigate its role in palliative and adjuvant tumor therapy.
诸如组织间、腔内和灌注热疗等内热疗方法,与高剂量率(HDR)或低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗相结合,由于已知热具有放射增敏和化学增敏潜力,已引起肿瘤学家越来越多的关注。与经皮加热技术相比,组织间技术具有几个优点:治疗体积受限,对正常组织的保护更好;可接近身体各部位较深的肿瘤;治疗温度分布更均匀;以及在使用广泛的“热图”程序时,对热参数有更好的控制和评估。目前正在研究几种有前景的技术,如射频(RF)、微波(MW)和热源(HS)技术。在1至2期研究中,组织间热疗(IHT)主要应用于头颈部、脑部、胸壁、盆腔区域和四肢的原发性晚期、持续性或局部复发性肿瘤,这些肿瘤对传统治疗方法反应不佳。尽管技术和临床治疗参数差异很大,但关于600例接受组织间热放疗(IHT-IRT)治疗患者的初步数据非常有前景。在各种临床试验中,肿瘤缓解率在完全缓解(CR)的11%至74%之间,就广泛的预处理方法而言,20%的总体并发症发生率似乎是可以接受的。到目前为止,已经确定了几个预后治疗因素:肿瘤体积;放射剂量;高最低肿瘤温度以及热疗治疗足够好的热质量。未来的技术创新应扩大介入热疗的临床应用,如术中热疗和腔内热疗。从这些经验来看,组织间热疗是一种有效且安全的治疗方式,尤其是与放疗联合用于肿瘤姑息治疗时。前瞻性随机多中心研究已经启动,以研究其在姑息性和辅助性肿瘤治疗中的作用。