U R, Noell K T, Worde B T, Woodward K T, Fishburn R I, Miller L S, Herskovic A M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1982 Mar;9(3):343-56.
The renewed interest in the possible use of localized hyperthermia in cancer therapy is prompted by two major realizations. The first is the radiobiological evidence indicating that there may be a significant advantage in the use of heat alone or combined with radiation therapy or chemotherapy to enhance the inactivation of tumor cells The second is that early clinical investigation with refractory malignant tumors at temperatures between 41 degrees C and 45 degrees C have shown tumor regression response rate over 70% without increasing normal tissue complication. A phase I/II study using electromagnetic hyperthermia immediately following administration of ionizing radiation was begun at Duke in the fall of 1976 to evaluate the response of normal tissues, the regression of cutaneous and subcutaneous tumors, and the feasibility of such combined modalities in therapeutic radiology. Each hyperthermia session consisted of 45 minutes at 42-43.5 degrees C 2-3 times per week immediately following radiotherapy. The radiation therapy fraction size was usually 2-3 Gy 3-5 times per week with a maximum total of 48 Gy. The 60+ patients treated to date have had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, malignant melanoma, plasmacytoma, liposarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma. After more than 600 hyperthermia sessions, we have found: (1) local hyperthermia with microwave alone or in combination with ionizing radiation can be used with excellent normal tissue tolerance provided local tissue temperatures are carefully monitored and controlled; (2) a significantly higher level of preferential heat induction into tumor tissue is possible as compared to surrounding normal tissues; (3) repeated hyperthermia at 42-43.5 degrees C for 45 minutes per session immediately following radiation therapy yields favorable therapeutic results. Tumor regression response rate of over 70% was achieved without concomitant increase of normal tissue complication. Therefore, the potentially significant impact on clinical cancer therapy, whether of curative or palliative intent, by moderate thermotherapy is evident. Technical advances to optimize such treatment methods including R & D for delivering a known localized quantity of heat to tumors in any location in the body are expected to progress rapidly. The methods with most promising potential for inducing local thermotherapy are those involving the use of electromagnetic waves, e.g., radiofrequency energy, microwave energy, and ultrasound energy.
对局部热疗在癌症治疗中可能应用的重新关注源于两个主要认识。第一个是放射生物学证据表明,单独使用热或与放射治疗或化疗联合使用可能在增强肿瘤细胞失活方面具有显著优势。第二个是对难治性恶性肿瘤在41摄氏度至45摄氏度之间进行的早期临床研究表明,肿瘤退缩反应率超过70%,且未增加正常组织并发症。1976年秋季,杜克大学开始了一项I/II期研究,在给予电离辐射后立即使用电磁热疗,以评估正常组织的反应、皮肤和皮下肿瘤的退缩情况以及这种联合治疗方式在放射治疗中的可行性。每次热疗疗程包括在42 - 43.5摄氏度下进行45分钟,每周2 - 3次,紧接在放射治疗之后。放射治疗每次分割剂量通常为2 - 3戈瑞,每周3 - 5次,最大总量为48戈瑞。迄今为止接受治疗的60多名患者患有鳞状细胞癌、腺癌、恶性黑色素瘤、浆细胞瘤、脂肪肉瘤、上皮样肉瘤和未分化癌。经过600多次热疗疗程后,我们发现:(1) 如果仔细监测和控制局部组织温度,单独使用微波或与电离辐射联合使用的局部热疗可以在正常组织耐受性良好的情况下使用;(2) 与周围正常组织相比,有可能使肿瘤组织中优先热诱导水平显著更高;(3) 在放射治疗后立即以42 - 43.5摄氏度重复进行每次45分钟的热疗可产生良好的治疗效果。实现了超过70%的肿瘤退缩反应率,且未伴随正常组织并发症的增加。因此,适度热疗对临床癌症治疗,无论是治愈性还是姑息性目的,都可能产生重大影响是显而易见的。预计包括研发向身体任何部位的肿瘤输送已知局部热量的技术在内的优化此类治疗方法的技术进展将迅速推进。诱导局部热疗最具潜力的方法是那些涉及使用电磁波的方法,例如射频能量、微波能量和超声能量。