Kelly Anne-Maree, McAlpine Ross, Kyle Elizabeth
Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Oct-Dec;16(5-6):407-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00642.x.
This study aims to determine the extent of agreement between venous and arterial bicarbonate for a group of emergency department patients with respiratory or metabolic illness requiring blood gas analysis as part of their evaluation.
This prospective study of patients who were deemed by their treating doctor to require an arterial blood gas analysis to determine their ventilatory or acid-base status, compared bicarbonate on an arterial and a venous sample taken as close to simultaneously as possible. Data were analysed using bias (Bland-Altman) methods. Subgroup analyses were performed for the metabolic, respiratory, chronic obstructive airways disease and acidotic subgroups.
Two hundred and forty-six patients were entered into the study; 195 with acute respiratory disease and 51 with suspected metabolic derangement. The values of bicarbonate on arterial and venous samples showed close agreement with an average difference between the samples of 1.20 mmol/L (95% limits of agreement being -2.73 to +5.13 mmol/L). Similar agreement was found for all subgroups.
Venous bicarbonate estimation shows a high level of agreement with the arterial value, with acceptably narrow 95% limits of agreement. These results suggest that venous bicarbonate estimation may be an acceptable substitute for arterial measurement.
本研究旨在确定一组因呼吸或代谢疾病而需进行血气分析以辅助评估的急诊科患者中,静脉血和动脉血碳酸氢根之间的一致性程度。
本前瞻性研究针对那些经主治医生判断需要进行动脉血气分析以确定其通气或酸碱状态的患者,比较了尽可能同时采集的动脉血样和静脉血样中的碳酸氢根。采用偏倚(Bland-Altman)方法对数据进行分析。对代谢、呼吸、慢性阻塞性气道疾病和酸中毒亚组进行了亚组分析。
246例患者纳入本研究;195例患有急性呼吸道疾病,51例疑似代谢紊乱。动脉血样和静脉血样中碳酸氢根的值显示出高度一致性,样本间平均差异为1.20 mmol/L(95%一致性界限为-2.73至+5.13 mmol/L)。所有亚组均发现类似的一致性。
静脉血碳酸氢根估计值与动脉血值显示出高度一致性,95%一致性界限可接受地窄。这些结果表明静脉血碳酸氢根估计值可能是动脉血测量的可接受替代方法。