Kundu Shilajit D, Roehl Kimberly A, Eggener Scott E, Antenor Jo Ann V, Han Misop, Catalona William J
Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2227-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000145222.94455.73.
We report results in a series of 3,477 consecutive patients treated with anatomical nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in terms of recovery of erectile function, urinary continence and postoperative complications.
From May 1983 through February 2003, 1 surgeon (WJC) performed anatomical RRP using a unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing modification when possible. Urinary continence and recovery of erections were evaluated in men with a minimum followup of 18 months. Excluded from potency analysis were men who were not reliably potent before surgery, those who did not undergo a nerve sparing procedure and those who received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy or hormonal therapy within 18 months of surgery. Other postoperative complications in this patient population were also evaluated.
Erections sufficient for intercourse occurred in 76% of preoperatively potent men treated with bilateral (1,770) and 53% of men treated with unilateral or partial nerve sparing (64) surgery. Adequate erectile function was more common following bilateral than unilateral nerve sparing surgery in men younger than 70 years old (78% versus 53%, p = 0.001) compared with those 70 years old or older (52% versus 56%, p = 0.6). Recovery of urinary continence occurred in 93% of all men and was associated with younger age (p = 0.001) but not nerve sparing surgery, tumor stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason grade or number of prior prostatectomies performed by the surgeon. Postoperative complications occurred in 320 (9%) of patients and were associated with older age (p <0.0001), nonnerve sparing surgery (p = 0.001), PSA era (p <0.0001) and surgeon experience. Complications were not significantly correlated with clinical stage, pathological stage, preoperative PSA or Gleason grade. There was no perioperative mortality.
Nerve sparing RRP can be performed with favorable potency and urinary continence. Better results are achieved in younger men. Other complications are reduced with increasing surgeon experience.
我们报告了连续3477例接受保留神经的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)患者在勃起功能、尿失禁及术后并发症恢复方面的结果。
从1983年5月至2003年2月,由1名外科医生(WJC)尽可能采用单侧或双侧保留神经改良术式进行解剖性RRP。对随访至少18个月的男性患者评估尿失禁及勃起功能恢复情况。性功能分析排除术前无可靠勃起功能者、未行保留神经手术者以及术后18个月内接受辅助放疗或激素治疗者。同时评估该患者群体的其他术后并发症。
双侧保留神经手术(1770例)治疗的术前有勃起功能的男性患者中,76%恢复了足以进行性交的勃起功能;单侧或部分保留神经手术(64例)治疗的患者中,这一比例为53%。70岁以下男性中,双侧保留神经手术较单侧保留神经手术更易获得充分勃起功能(78%对53%,p = 0.001);而70岁及以上男性中,两者差异无统计学意义(52%对56%,p = 0.6)。93%的患者恢复了尿失禁,且与年龄较轻相关(p = 0.001),但与保留神经手术、肿瘤分期、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、Gleason分级或外科医生既往进行前列腺切除术的次数无关。320例(9%)患者发生术后并发症,与年龄较大(p <0.0001)、未行保留神经手术(p = 0.001)、PSA时代(p <0.0001)及外科医生经验相关。并发症与临床分期、病理分期、术前PSA或Gleason分级无显著相关性。无围手术期死亡。
保留神经的RRP可实现良好的性功能和尿失禁恢复。年轻男性效果更佳。随着外科医生经验增加,其他并发症减少。