Dennehy John J, Turner Paul E
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, PO Box 208106, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 7;271(1554):2275-82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2833.
Co-infection by multiple viruses affords opportunities for the evolution of cheating strategies to use intracellular resources. Cheating may be costly, however, when viruses infect cells alone. We previously allowed the RNA bacteriophage phi6 to evolve for 250 generations in replicated environments allowing co-infection of Pseudomonas phaseolicola bacteria. Derived genotypes showed great capacity to compete during co-infection, but suffered reduced performance in solo infections. Thus, the evolved viruses appear to be cheaters that sacrifice between-host fitness for within-host fitness. It is unknown, however, which stage of the lytic growth cycle is linked to the cost of cheating. Here, we examine the cost through burst assays, where lytic infection can be separated into three discrete phases (analogous to phage life history): dispersal stage, latent period (juvenile stage), and burst (adult stage). We compared growth of a representative cheater and its ancestor in environments where the cost occurs. The cost of cheating was shown to be reduced fecundity, because cheaters feature a significantly smaller burst size (progeny produced per infected cell) when infecting on their own. Interestingly, latent period (average burst time) of the evolved virus was much longer than that of the ancestor, indicating the cost does not follow a life history trade-off between timing of reproduction and lifetime fecundity. Our data suggest that interference competition allows high fitness of derived cheaters in mixed infections, and we discuss preferential encapsidation as one possible mechanism.
多种病毒的共同感染为利用细胞内资源的作弊策略的进化提供了机会。然而,当病毒单独感染细胞时,作弊可能会付出代价。我们之前让RNA噬菌体phi6在允许菜豆假单胞菌共同感染的复制环境中进化250代。衍生的基因型在共同感染期间表现出很强的竞争能力,但在单独感染时性能下降。因此,进化后的病毒似乎是为了宿主内适应性而牺牲宿主间适应性的作弊者。然而,尚不清楚裂解生长周期的哪个阶段与作弊成本相关。在这里,我们通过爆发试验来研究成本,在爆发试验中,裂解感染可以分为三个离散阶段(类似于噬菌体的生活史):传播阶段、潜伏期(幼年期)和爆发期(成年期)。我们比较了代表性作弊者及其祖先在出现成本的环境中的生长情况。结果表明,作弊的成本是繁殖力降低,因为作弊者在单独感染时的爆发大小(每个感染细胞产生的后代)明显更小。有趣的是,进化后病毒的潜伏期(平均爆发时间)比其祖先长得多,这表明成本并不遵循繁殖时间和终身繁殖力之间的生活史权衡。我们的数据表明,干扰竞争使得衍生的作弊者在混合感染中具有高适应性,并且我们讨论了优先包装作为一种可能的机制。