• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经合组织国家非正式照料者可获得性对长期护理支出的影响。

Impacts of informal caregiver availability on long-term care expenditures in OECD countries.

作者信息

Yoo Byung-Kwang, Bhattacharya Jay, McDonald Kathryn M, Garber Alan M

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 2):1971-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00328.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00328.x
PMID:15544640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1361108/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effects of informal caregiver availability and public funding on formal long-term care (LTC) expenditures in developed countries.

DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: Secondary data were acquired for 15 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries from 1970 to 2000.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary data analysis, applying fixed- and random-effects models to time-series cross-sectional data. Outcome variables are inpatient or home heath LTC expenditures. Key explanatory variables are measures of the availability of informal caregivers, generosity in public funding for formal LTC, and the proportion of the elderly population in the total population.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHOD: Aggregated macro data were obtained from OECD Health Data, United Nations Demographic Yearbooks, and U.S. Census Bureau International Data Base.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Most of the 15 OECD countries experienced growth in LTC expenditures over the study period. The availability of a spouse caregiver, measured by male-to-female ratio among the elderly, is associated with a $28,840 (1995 U.S. dollars) annual reduction in formal LTC expenditure per additional elderly male. Availability of an adult child caregiver, measured by female labor force participation and full-time/part-time status shift, is associated with a reduction of $310 to $3,830 in LTC expenditures. These impacts on LTC expenditure vary across countries and across time within a country.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of an informal caregiver, particularly a spouse caregiver, is among the most important factors explaining variation in LTC expenditure growth. Long-term care policies should take into account behavioral responses: decreased public funding in LTC may lead working women to leave the labor force to provide more informal care.

摘要

目的

量化发达国家非正式照料者的可获得性及公共资金对正式长期护理(LTC)支出的影响。

数据来源/研究背景:获取了1970年至2000年期间15个经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的二手数据。

研究设计

对时间序列横截面数据应用固定效应模型和随机效应模型进行二手数据分析。结果变量为住院或居家健康LTC支出。关键解释变量包括非正式照料者的可获得性指标、正式LTC公共资金的慷慨程度以及老年人口在总人口中的比例。

数据收集/提取方法:汇总的宏观数据来自经合组织卫生数据、联合国人口年鉴以及美国人口普查局国际数据库。

主要发现

在研究期间,15个经合组织国家中的大多数国家LTC支出都有所增长。以老年男性与女性的比例衡量的配偶照料者的可获得性,与每增加一名老年男性每年正式LTC支出减少28,840美元(1995年美元)相关。以女性劳动力参与率和全职/兼职状态转变衡量的成年子女照料者的可获得性,与LTC支出减少310美元至3,830美元相关。这些对LTC支出的影响在不同国家以及一个国家内的不同时间有所不同。

结论

非正式照料者,尤其是配偶照料者的可获得性,是解释LTC支出增长差异的最重要因素之一。长期护理政策应考虑行为反应:LTC公共资金减少可能导致职业女性离开劳动力市场以提供更多非正式照料。

相似文献

1
Impacts of informal caregiver availability on long-term care expenditures in OECD countries.经合组织国家非正式照料者可获得性对长期护理支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 2):1971-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00328.x.
2
Effect of reduced formal care availability on formal/informal care patterns and caregiver health: a quasi-experimental study using the Japanese long-term care insurance reform.减少正规照料服务供给对正规/非正规照料模式和照料者健康的影响:利用日本长期护理保险改革进行的准实验研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jun 12;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01588-7.
3
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers.长期护理的可持续性:政策制定者面临的棘手任务。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):195-205. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109.
4
Trends over the past 15 years in long-term care in Switzerland: a comparison with Germany, Italy, Norway, and the United Kingdom.过去 15 年瑞士长期护理的趋势:与德国、意大利、挪威和英国的比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05195-8.
5
ANALYSIS OF TRENDS IN LIFE EXPECTANCIES AND PER CAPITA GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AS WELL AS PHARMACEUTICAL AND NON-PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTHCARE EXPENDITURES.人均预期寿命、人均国内生产总值以及医药和非医药医疗保健支出的趋势分析
Acta Pol Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1045-50.
6
Trajectories of long-term care in 28 EU countries: evidence from a time series analysis.28 个欧盟国家长期护理轨迹:时间序列分析证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):948-954. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx177.
7
The associations of multimorbidity with the sum of annual medical and long-term care expenditures in Japan.日本多病共存与年度医疗和长期护理支出总和的关联。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1057-7.
8
Explaining Variations in Long-term Care Use and Expenditures Under the Public Long-term Care Insurance Systems: A Case Study Comparison of Korea and Japan.解释公共长期护理保险制度下长期护理使用和支出的差异:以韩国和日本为例的案例研究比较。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6640. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6640. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
9
Effect of caregiving relationship and formal long-term care service use on caregiver well-being.照料关系和正规长期照料服务使用对照料者福祉的影响。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1714-1721. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12958. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Financing long-term care: ex ante, ex post or both?长期护理融资:事前、事后还是两者兼顾?
Health Econ. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:45-57. doi: 10.1002/hec.3152.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiving in long-term care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.COVID-19大流行之前及期间长期护理中的照护:一项范围综述
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1231-1243. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01029-3. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
'Investing' in care for old age? An examination of long-term care expenditure dynamics and its spillovers.对老年护理进行“投资”?长期护理支出动态及其溢出效应研究。
Empir Econ. 2023;64(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s00181-022-02246-0. Epub 2022 May 27.
3
Longitudinal Association of Salaries for Medical Staff With Medical Service Utilization and Expenditure in China, 2007-2016.中国医务人员薪酬与医疗服务利用和支出的纵向关联:2007-2016 年。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;9:767541. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.767541. eCollection 2021.
4
Does Gender Matter in the Receipt of Informal Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-National Comparative Study Across the United States, South Korea, and China.性别在社区居住的老年人接受非正式护理方面是否重要?来自美国、韩国和中国的跨国比较研究的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jun 8;76(Suppl 1):S64-S75. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa018.
5
Have Hospice Costs Increased After Implementation of the Hospice Quality-Reporting Program?实施临终关怀质量报告计划后,临终关怀费用增加了吗?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jul;58(1):48-55.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
The health heterogeneity of and health care utilization by the elderly in Taiwan.台湾老年人的健康异质性与医疗保健利用情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan 27;11(2):1384-97. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110201384.
7
Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs.社区中残疾老年人的正式和非正式护理:对法国护理构成和成本的评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):327-36. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0305-3. Epub 2011 Mar 13.
8
A tool to analyse gender mainstreaming and care-giving models in support plans for informal care: case studies in Andalusia and the United Kingdom.一种用于分析非正式照护支持计划中的性别主流化和照护模式的工具:安达卢西亚和英国的案例研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Dec;61 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii32-38. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.060665.
9
Increasing the global exchange of evidence-based research.增加循证研究的全球交流。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr;41(2):303-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00540.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Forecasting the nursing home population.预测养老院人口数量。
Med Care. 2003 Jan;41(1):8-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200301000-00003.
2
Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999.1982年至1999年美国65岁以上黑人与非黑人人口中慢性残疾患病率的变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111152298. Epub 2001 May 8.
3
Predicting elderly people's risk for nursing home placement, hospitalization, functional impairment, and mortality: a synthesis.预测老年人入住养老院、住院、功能障碍和死亡的风险:一项综合分析。
Med Care Res Rev. 2000 Sep;57(3):259-97. doi: 10.1177/107755870005700301.
4
Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries.人口老龄化:工业化国家之间的比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):191-203. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.191.
5
The effect of longevity on spending for acute and long-term care.长寿对急性和长期护理支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1409-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421906.
6
Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study.照料作为死亡的一个风险因素:照料者健康影响研究。
JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.23.2215.
7
Medicare home health agency utilization, 1984-1994.1984 - 1994年医疗保险家庭健康机构的使用情况
Inquiry. 1999 Fall;36(3):291-303.
8
Trends in Medicaid nursing home reimbursement: 1978-89.医疗补助计划中疗养院报销的趋势:1978 - 1989年
Health Care Financ Rev. 1993 Summer;14(4):111-32.
9
The determinants and effects of health expenditure in developed countries.发达国家卫生支出的决定因素及影响
J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):173-81. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90033-w.
10
An econometric analysis of health care expenditure: a cross-section study of the OECD countries.医疗保健支出的计量经济学分析:经合组织国家的横断面研究。
J Health Econ. 1992 May;11(1):63-84. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(92)90025-v.