• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别在社区居住的老年人接受非正式护理方面是否重要?来自美国、韩国和中国的跨国比较研究的证据。

Does Gender Matter in the Receipt of Informal Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-National Comparative Study Across the United States, South Korea, and China.

机构信息

Daegu University, Gyongsan, South Korea.

University of New Hampshire, Durham.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jun 8;76(Suppl 1):S64-S75. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa018.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbaa018
PMID:32112112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8186855/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compares patterns of gender difference in the receipt of informal care among community-dwelling older adults across the United States, Korea, and China where family-oriented systems for providing care to older adults are emphasized.

METHOD

Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study, the 2014 Korea Longitudinal Study of Aging, and the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Logistic regression models were used to predict the receipt of informal care by gender. We also examined how the effects of health and living arrangement on the receipt of informal care differ depending on gender.

RESULTS

In the United States and China, older women were more likely to receive informal care than men. However, older Korean women were less likely to receive informal care than men. The effects of health and living arrangement on the use of informal care were moderated by gender in different ways across countries.

DISCUSSION

This study provides evidence that patterns of gender differences in the receipt of informal care vary across the three countries. More attention needs to be paid to the design and implementation of long-term supports and services to address the unique patterns of gender difference in care arrangement in each country.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了强调为老年人提供家庭式照护的美国、韩国和中国这三个国家和地区中,社区居住的老年人在接受非正式照护方面的性别差异模式。

方法

数据来自 2014 年美国健康与退休研究、2014 年韩国老龄化纵向研究和 2015 年中国健康与退休纵向研究。使用逻辑回归模型预测性别对非正式照护的接受程度。我们还研究了健康和生活安排对非正式照护的影响如何因性别而异。

结果

在美国和中国,女性比男性更有可能接受非正式照护。然而,韩国的老年女性比男性更不可能接受非正式照护。健康和生活安排对非正式照护使用的影响在不同国家以不同的方式受到性别的调节。

讨论

本研究提供了证据,表明在接受非正式照护方面的性别差异模式在这三个国家有所不同。需要更加关注长期支持和服务的设计和实施,以解决每个国家独特的性别差异照护模式。

相似文献

1
Does Gender Matter in the Receipt of Informal Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-National Comparative Study Across the United States, South Korea, and China.性别在社区居住的老年人接受非正式护理方面是否重要?来自美国、韩国和中国的跨国比较研究的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jun 8;76(Suppl 1):S64-S75. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa018.
2
Caregiving for Community-Dwelling Older Persons in South Korea: Current Formal and Informal Care Use and Expectation.韩国社区居住老年人的照护:当前正式和非正式照护的使用和期望。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Apr;39(4):398-403. doi: 10.1177/0733464819866360. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Comparative Analysis of Gender and Age Patterns in Informal Care Received among Disabled Older Adults: A Cross-National Study across the United States, Mexico, China, and Indonesia.残疾老年人非正式照料的性别和年龄模式比较分析:一项跨越美国、墨西哥、中国和印度尼西亚的跨国研究。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2023 Dec;38(4):389-415. doi: 10.1007/s10823-023-09488-0. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
What determines informal care need among community-dwelling older adults in China? Results from a longitudinal study.什么因素决定了中国社区居住的老年人群体的非正式护理需求?一项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04843-3.
5
The Potential of Informal Care for Self-Perceptions of Aging Among Older Community-Dwelling Adults: Longitudinal Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.非正式照料对社区居住老年人衰老自我认知的影响:来自健康与退休研究的纵向研究结果
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Mar 1;79(3). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad189.
6
Care inequality: care received according to gender, marital status, and socioeconomic status among Korean older adults with disability.照护不平等:韩国残疾老年群体中基于性别、婚姻状况和社会经济地位的照护差异
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 3;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1008-0.
7
Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States.美国残疾老年人接受家庭护理方面的性别差异。
JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3022-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3022.
8
Receipt of Caregiving and Fall Risk in US Community-dwelling Older Adults.美国社区居住老年人的护理接受情况与跌倒风险
Med Care. 2017 Apr;55(4):371-378. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000677.
9
Gendered Trends in Formal and Informal Care Utilization Among Older Adults in South Korea.韩国老年人正式和非正式护理使用中的性别差异趋势
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 May 3:1-16. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2349495.
10
A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults: a comparison of China and the United States.一项关于老年人自评健康的横断面研究:中国与美国的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 31;9(7):e027895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027895.

引用本文的文献

1
Can long-term care insurance reduce catastrophic health and long-term care expenditures among older adults? A quasi-experimental study in China.长期护理保险能否降低老年人的灾难性医疗和长期护理支出?一项在中国进行的准实验研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Jun 3;22(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00861-1.
2
The Intersection of Gender, Culture and Society for Caregivers of Older Adults Ageing in Place in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省居家养老老年人照料者的性别、文化与社会交集
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70259. doi: 10.1111/hex.70259.
3
Informal Care Receiving Among Older Adults: The Role of Multimorbidity and Intersectional Social Position.老年人中的非正式照护接受情况:多重疾病和交叉社会地位的作用
Gerontologist. 2025 Apr 9;65(5). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf071.
4
Who came to the rescue? Sources of informal support to older Europeans before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.谁来施以援手?新冠疫情之前、期间及之后欧洲老年人的非正式支持来源。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf034.
5
Under-Prescription of Drugs in the Elderly Population of Western Romania: An Analysis Based on STOPP/START Version 2 Criteria.罗马尼亚西部老年人群体药物处方不足:基于STOPP/START第2版标准的分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 8;13(19):5970. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195970.
6
Changes in Family Structure and Increasing Care Gaps in the United States, 2015-2050.美国 2015-2050 年家庭结构变化与照料缺口增大
Demography. 2024 Oct 1;61(5):1403-1426. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11551558.
7
What determines informal care need among community-dwelling older adults in China? Results from a longitudinal study.什么因素决定了中国社区居住的老年人群体的非正式护理需求?一项纵向研究的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04843-3.
8
Activities of daily living limitations and the use of physical examination among older adults with informal care in China: do gender and residence make differences?日常生活活动受限与体格检查在我国有非正式照护的老年人群中的应用:性别和居住状况是否存在差异?
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04673-3.
9
Analyzing Community Care Research Trends Using Text Mining.运用文本挖掘分析社区护理研究趋势
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Jul 15;15:1493-1510. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S366726. eCollection 2022.
10
Living Arrangements and Intergenerational Support in Puerto Rico: Are Fathers Disadvantaged?波多黎各的居住安排和代际支持:父亲是否处于不利地位?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Nov 23;77(11):2078-2090. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac044.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender Patterns of Eldercare in China.中国老年人护理中的性别模式。
Fem Econ. 2018;24(2):54-76. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2018.1438639. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Typology of parent-child ties within families: Associations with psychological well-being.家庭中亲子关系的类型:与心理健康的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Jun;34(4):448-458. doi: 10.1037/fam0000595. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Gender Differences in Spousal Caregivers' Care and Housework: Fact or Fiction?配偶照料者的照料和家务劳动中的性别差异:事实还是虚构?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jan 1;75(1):173-183. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby087.
4
Disability and Activity-related Emotion in Later Life: Are Effects Buffered by Intimate Relationship Support and Strain?晚年的残疾和与活动相关的情绪:亲密关系支持和紧张是否会缓冲其影响?
J Health Soc Behav. 2017 Sep;58(3):387-403. doi: 10.1177/0022146517713551. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
5
Gender Differences in Spousal Care Across the Later Life Course.晚年生活中配偶照料的性别差异。
Res Aging. 2017 Sep;39(8):934-959. doi: 10.1177/0164027516644503. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
6
Living arrangements of the elderly in China: evidence from the CHARLS national baseline.中国老年人的居住安排:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)全国基线调查的证据
China Economic J. 2015;8(3):191-214. doi: 10.1080/17538963.2015.1102473. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Unmet needs in long-term care and their associated factors among the oldest old in China.中国高龄老人长期护理方面的未满足需求及其相关因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Apr 12;15:46. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0045-9.
8
Disability and care needs among older Americans.美国老年人的残疾与护理需求。
Milbank Q. 2014 Sep;92(3):509-41. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12076.
9
Who cares? A comparison of informal and formal care provision in Spain, England and the USA.谁在乎呢?西班牙、英国和美国非正式与正式护理服务的比较。
Ageing Soc. 2014 Mar 1;34(3):495-517. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X12001134.
10
Trends in ADL and IADL disability in community-dwelling older adults in Shanghai, China, 1998-2008.1998-2008 年中国上海社区居住老年人日常生活活动和工具性日常生活活动能力的变化趋势。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 May;68(3):476-85. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt012. Epub 2013 Mar 22.