Suppr超能文献

在繁忙的常规X光科室中,对膝关节骨关节炎进行放射学评估时,半屈曲(MTP)位视图与站立伸展位视图(SEV)的比较。

A comparison of the semiflexed (MTP) view with the standing extended view (SEV) in the radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis in a busy routine X-ray department.

作者信息

Duddy J, Kirwan J R, Szebenyi B, Clarke S, Granell R, Volkov S

机构信息

University of Bristol Academy, Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Mar;44(3):349-51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh476. Epub 2004 Nov 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reproducibility of the standing extended view (SEV) (also known as the standing anteroposterior view) with the semiflexed, postero-anterior view [the 'metatarsophalangeal' (MTP)] view for assessing joint space width (JSW) and osteophytes in osteoarthritis of the knee when used in a busy routine X-ray department.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients (24 men) had both SEV and MTP views taken on the same day in a busy National Health Service radiography department. Repeat views were taken as entirely separate procedures some time over the following 2 weeks, in the same department and with no special arrangements for the selection of radiographers, time of day, or X-ray machine. The first 24 patients had second views in the SEV position whilst the remaining 23 had second MTP views. Radiographs were read independently by two experienced observers who measured JSW with a transparent ruler to the nearest 0.5 mm at the narrowest point in both medial and lateral compartments of the tibiofemoral joint in both knees. Osteophytes were graded 0-2 according to a standard atlas. Ten SEV and 10 MTP radiographs selected randomly were re-read by one observer.

RESULTS

Mean (95% confidence interval) JSW in the medial compartment measured on SEV radiographs was 3.54 mm (3.08, 3.99) and on MTP radiographs it was 2.80 mm (2.37, 3.23); in the lateral compartment it was 6.04 mm (5.71, 6.37) when measured on SEV radiographs and 5.47 mm (5.09, 5.85) on MTP radiographs. The estimated variances for the medial compartment were 2.0 mm2 for SEV and 0.2 mm2 for MTP (P < 0.001) and for the lateral compartment 1.4 mm2 for SEV and 0.5 mm2 for MTP (P < 0.001). The proportion of radiographs for which there was disagreement between observers regarding osteophyte grade was not statistically different between SEV and MTP views (SEV, medial 40%, lateral 44%; MTP, medial 39%, lateral 39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when radiographs are taken in a busy National Health Service radiography department, measurement of JSW from the MTP view is more reproducible than from the SEV view, the MTP view gives a slightly lower measurement of JSW, and there is no advantage in using either view in recording osteophyte grade. We recommend the wider adoption of the MTP method.

摘要

目的

比较站立伸展位视图(SEV)(也称为站立前后位视图)与半屈曲后前位视图[即“跖趾关节”(MTP)视图]在繁忙的日常X光科室用于评估膝关节骨关节炎时关节间隙宽度(JSW)和骨赘的可重复性。

方法

47例患者(24例男性)在繁忙的国民医疗服务体系放射科于同一天拍摄了SEV和MTP视图。在接下来的2周内的某个时间,作为完全独立的检查再次拍摄视图,在同一科室进行,且在选择放射技师、拍摄时间或X光机方面没有特殊安排。前24例患者在SEV位进行第二次拍摄,其余23例进行第二次MTP视图拍摄。由两名经验丰富的观察者独立阅读X光片,他们使用透明直尺在双膝关节胫股关节内侧和外侧间隙最窄处测量JSW,精确到最接近的0.5毫米。根据标准图谱将骨赘分为0 - 2级。一名观察者对随机选择的10张SEV和10张MTPX光片进行再次阅读。

结果

在SEVX光片上测量的内侧间隙平均(95%置信区间)JSW为3.54毫米(3.08,3.99),在MTPX光片上为2.80毫米(2.37,3.23);在外侧间隙,在SEVX光片上测量为6.04毫米(5.71,6.37),在MTPX光片上为5.47毫米(5.09,5.85)。内侧间隙SEV的估计方差为2.0平方毫米,MTP为0.2平方毫米(P < 0.001),外侧间隙SEV为1.4平方毫米,MTP为0.5平方毫米(P < 0.001)。观察者之间关于骨赘分级存在分歧的X光片比例在SEV和MTP视图之间无统计学差异(SEV,内侧40%,外侧44%;MTP,内侧39%,外侧39%)。

结论

即使在繁忙的国民医疗服务体系放射科拍摄X光片,从MTP视图测量JSW比从SEV视图更具可重复性,MTP视图测量的JSW略低,并且在记录骨赘分级方面使用两种视图均无优势。我们建议更广泛地采用MTP方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验