Killeen Therese K, Brady Kathleen T, Gold Paul B, Simpson Kit N, Faldowski Richard A, Tyson Clare, Anton Raymond F
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004 Nov;28(11):1710-7. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000145688.30448.2c.
In several large, well-designed, randomized, double-blind studies, the opiate antagonist naltrexone demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Specifically, when combined with certain psychosocial therapies, naltrexone reduces the number of drinking days, heavy drinking, and time to relapse to alcohol use in alcohol-dependent individuals. Whether this efficacy can be generalized to individuals who have alcohol use disorders and present for treatment at front-line community treatment programs has not been well established.
A total of 145 patients who presented for treatment at a rural community substance abuse treatment center were randomized to receive naltrexone 50 mg daily plus usual program treatment (n = 54), placebo plus usual treatment (n = 43), or usual treatment alone (n = 48) for 12 week. A total of 133 participants had at least one follow-up visit. Primary outcome measures included percent days drinking, average drinks per drinking day, average drinks per day, heavy drinking days (four or more for women and six or more for men), and time to first heavy drinking day. Secondary measures included changes in serum biological markers (alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase), craving, and psychosocial functioning.
In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no between-group differences for any of the primary drinking outcomes at 12 weeks. In post hoc exploratory analyses, the entire sample of participants was divided into two new groups: (1) people who drank during the 2 weeks before the start of medication (entry drinkers) and (2) people who did not drink during this interval (entry abstainers). Entry abstainers were at an advantage at study entry in that they were significantly more likely to have an inpatient hospitalization immediately before entry into outpatient treatment. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed a main effect for entry group at the 12-week treatment endpoint on the primary outcome measures of percent days drinking, average drinks per drinking day, average drinks per day, heavy drinking days, and time to first heavy drinking day. Participants in any of the randomized groups who were entry abstainers had significantly better improvement on all of the primary outcome measures. The abstainer groups that were randomized to placebo and usual treatment had significantly better outcomes than the entry drinkers in those perspective groups. However, for the naltrexone-treated group, entry drinkers and entry abstainers had similar improvement in drinking-related outcomes.
These data suggest that naltrexone may offer particular benefit to patients who continue to drink during the early stages of the trial as compared with those who have achieved abstinence before treatment entry.
在几项大型、设计良好的随机双盲研究中,阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮在酒精依赖治疗中显示出疗效。具体而言,与某些心理社会疗法联合使用时,纳曲酮可减少酒精依赖个体的饮酒天数、重度饮酒情况以及复饮时间。然而,这种疗效是否能推广到患有酒精使用障碍并在一线社区治疗项目中接受治疗的个体,尚未得到充分证实。
共有145名在农村社区药物滥用治疗中心接受治疗的患者被随机分为三组,分别接受每日50毫克纳曲酮加常规项目治疗(n = 54)、安慰剂加常规治疗(n = 43)或仅接受常规治疗(n = 48),为期12周。共有133名参与者至少进行了一次随访。主要结局指标包括饮酒天数百分比、每个饮酒日的平均饮酒量、每日平均饮酒量、重度饮酒天数(女性为4杯及以上,男性为6杯及以上)以及首次重度饮酒日的时间。次要指标包括血清生物标志物(碱性磷酸酶、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶)的变化、渴望程度以及心理社会功能。
在意向性分析中,12周时任何主要饮酒结局指标在组间均无差异。在事后探索性分析中,所有参与者样本被分为两个新组:(1)在开始用药前2周内饮酒的人(入组饮酒者)和(2)在此期间未饮酒的人(入组戒酒者)。入组戒酒者在研究开始时具有优势,因为他们在进入门诊治疗前更有可能立即接受住院治疗。方差混合模型分析显示,在12周治疗终点时,入组组对饮酒天数百分比、每个饮酒日的平均饮酒量、每日平均饮酒量、重度饮酒天数以及首次重度饮酒日的时间等主要结局指标有主效应。任何随机分组中入组戒酒者在所有主要结局指标上的改善都明显更好。随机接受安慰剂和常规治疗的戒酒者组在这些方面的结局明显优于入组饮酒者。然而,对于接受纳曲酮治疗的组,入组饮酒者和入组戒酒者在与饮酒相关的结局方面有相似的改善。
这些数据表明,与治疗开始前已戒酒的患者相比,纳曲酮可能对在试验早期仍继续饮酒的患者特别有益。