• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRO-SELF疼痛控制方案提高了患者对癌症疼痛管理的认知。

The PRO-SELF pain control program improves patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.

作者信息

Kim Jung-Eun, Dodd Marilyn, West Claudia, Paul Steven, Facione Noreen, Schumacher Karen, Tripathy Debu, Koo Peter, Miaskowski Christine

机构信息

University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Nov 16;31(6):1137-43. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1137-1143.

DOI:10.1188/04.ONF.1137-1143
PMID:15547636
Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a psychoeducational program (i.e., PRO-SELF Pain Control Program) compared to standard care in increasing patients' knowledge regarding cancer pain management.

DESIGN

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Seven outpatient settings in northern California.

SAMPLE

174 outpatients with cancer and pain from bone metastasis.

METHODS

Following randomization into either the PRO-SELF or standard care group, patients completed the Pain Experience Scale (PES) prior to and at the completion of the intervention.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Total and individual item scores on the PES.

FINDINGS

Total PES knowledge scores increased significantly in the PRO-SELF group (21%) compared to the standard care group (0.5%). Significant improvements in knowledge scores for patients in the PRO-SELF group were found on five of the nine PES items when compared to baseline scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The PRO-SELF Pain Control Program was an effective approach to increase patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

The use of a structured paper-and-pencil questionnaire, such as the PES, as part of a psychoeducational intervention provides an effective foundation for patient education in cancer pain management. Oncology nurses can use patients' responses to this type of questionnaire to individualize the teaching and to spend more time on the identified knowledge deficits. This individualized approach to education about pain management may save staff time and improve patient outcomes.

摘要

目的/目标:评估一项心理教育项目(即PRO-SELF疼痛控制项目)相较于标准护理,在增加患者对癌症疼痛管理知识方面的有效性。

设计

随机临床试验。

地点

加利福尼亚北部的七个门诊机构。

样本

174名患有癌症且因骨转移而疼痛的门诊患者。

方法

随机分为PRO-SELF组或标准护理组后,患者在干预前及干预结束时完成疼痛体验量表(PES)。

主要研究变量

PES的总分及各单项得分。

研究结果

与标准护理组(0.5%)相比,PRO-SELF组的PES知识总分显著提高(21%)。与基线得分相比,PRO-SELF组患者在九个PES项目中的五个项目上的知识得分有显著改善。

结论

PRO-SELF疼痛控制项目是增加患者癌症疼痛管理知识的有效方法。

对护理的启示

使用结构化的纸笔问卷,如PES,作为心理教育干预的一部分,为癌症疼痛管理的患者教育提供了有效的基础。肿瘤护士可以利用患者对这类问卷的回答来个性化教学,并将更多时间花在已确定的知识缺陷上。这种关于疼痛管理的个性化教育方法可能节省工作人员的时间并改善患者的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
The PRO-SELF pain control program improves patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.PRO-SELF疼痛控制方案提高了患者对癌症疼痛管理的认知。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Nov 16;31(6):1137-43. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1137-1143.
2
The PRO-SELF(©) Pain Control Program improves patients' knowledge of cancer pain management.PRO-SELF(©)疼痛控制方案可提高患者对癌症疼痛管理的认识。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep;44(3):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.09.015. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
3
Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management.一项自我护理干预措施改善癌症疼痛管理效果的随机临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1713-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.140.
4
The PRO-SELF(c): Pain Control Program--an effective approach for cancer pain management.PRO-SELF(c):疼痛控制项目——一种有效的癌症疼痛管理方法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):65-73. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.65-73.
5
Differences in pain knowledge and perception of the pain experience between outpatients with cancer and their family caregivers.癌症门诊患者及其家庭照顾者在疼痛知识和对疼痛体验的认知方面的差异。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Sep;22(8):1235-41.
6
The PRO-SELF pain control program improves family caregivers' knowledge of cancer pain management.PRO-SELF 疼痛控制方案提高了癌症患者家庭照护者对疼痛管理的认识。
Cancer Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(6):429-35. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182747bcf.
7
Improving cancer pain management by homecare nurses.家庭护理护士改善癌症疼痛管理。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Jul 13;31(4):809-16. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.809-816. Print 2004 Jul.
8
The usefulness of a daily pain management diary for outpatients with cancer-related pain.每日疼痛管理日记对癌症相关疼痛门诊患者的实用性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Oct;29(9):1304-13. doi: 10.1188/02.ONF.1304-1313.
9
Knowledge and attitudes about cancer pain management: a national survey of Italian oncology nurses.关于癌症疼痛管理的知识与态度:一项针对意大利肿瘤护理人员的全国性调查。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jul;11(3):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
10
Improving pain outcomes of hospice patients with cancer.改善临终关怀癌症患者的疼痛状况。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Oct;26(9):1499-504.

引用本文的文献

1
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
2
Knowledge About Postoperative Pain and Its Management in Surgical Patients.外科患者术后疼痛及其管理的相关知识。
Cureus. 2020 Jan 17;12(1):e6685. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6685.
3
Intervention Mapping to develop a Social Cognitive Theory-based intervention for chronic pain tailored to individuals with HIV.采用干预映射法为感染艾滋病毒的个体开发一种基于社会认知理论的慢性疼痛干预措施。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Feb 19;10:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.02.004. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
2017 HIVMA of IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients Living With HIV.2017 年美国传染病学会艾滋病毒医学协会慢性 HIV 感染者疼痛管理临床实践指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):e1-e37. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix636.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis: comprehensive guideline of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Orthopedic Association, Japanese Urological Association, and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.骨转移的诊断与治疗:日本临床肿瘤学会、日本骨科学会、日本泌尿外科学会及日本放射肿瘤学会综合指南
ESMO Open. 2016 Mar 16;1(2):e000037. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000037. eCollection 2016.
6
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Newest Vital Sign: a preliminary study.日本版最新生命体征的有效性和可靠性:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 24;9(4):e94582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094582. eCollection 2014.
7
Oncology Rehabilitation Provision and Practice Patterns across Canada.加拿大各地的肿瘤康复服务与实践模式。
Physiother Can. 2013 Winter;65(1):94-102. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-53.
8
Optimal patient education for cancer pain: a systematic review and theory-based meta-analysis.癌症疼痛的最佳患者教育:系统评价和基于理论的荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1995-0. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
Predictors of high score patient-reported barriers to controlling cancer pain: a preliminary report.预测控制癌症疼痛患者报告障碍的高分因素:初步报告。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Apr;21(4):1175-83. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1646-x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
Interventions to improve continuity of care in the follow-up of patients with cancer.改善癌症患者随访中医疗连续性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD007672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007672.pub2.