• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌:它比开放手术更好吗?

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: is it better than open surgery?

作者信息

Rassweiler Jens J, Schulze Michael, Marrero Reinaldo, Frede Thomas, Palou Redorta Juan, Bassi Pierfrancesco

机构信息

Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Am Gesundbrunnen 20, D-74078 Heilbronn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2004 Dec;46(6):690-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.006
PMID:15548434
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 1991, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy has been introduced as a treatment option for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Based on the review of the current literature and personal experience we want to analyze the actual results of this technique in comparison to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE/PubMed search and reviewed the literature on laparoscopic and open nephroureterectomy between 1991 and 2004 (n = 1365 patients) including the results of 45 patients who underwent either laparoscopic (n = 23) or open nephroureterectomy (n = 21) during the same period of time at the Klinikum Heilbronn. Demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were compared.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed a slightly longer OR-time (276.6 vs. 220.1 min), and significantly lower blood loss (240.9 vs. 462.9 ml) in the laparoscopic series. No differences of minor (12.9 vs. 14.1%) or major complication rate (5.6 vs. 8.3%) were observed. All nine comparative studies revealed a significant dose reduction of the morphine-equivalents after laparoscopy. In all ten comparative series the hospital stay was shorter after laparoscopy, but only in 6 series the difference was statistically significant. The frequency of bladder recurrence (24.0 vs. 24.7%), local recurrence (4.4 vs. 6.3%), and distant metastases (15.5% vs. 15.2) did not differ significantly in both groups. The actual disease-free two-year survival rates (75.2 vs. 76.2%) were similar. The five-year survival rates averaged 81.2% in the three laparoscopic (n = 113 pat.) and 61% in the ten open series (n = 681 pat.) Six port site metastases were reported in 377 (1.6%) analyzed patients occurring 3 to 12 months following laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Open radical nephroureterectomy still represents the golden standard for the management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma, however, laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy offers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery without deteriorating the oncological outcome. In case of advanced tumors (pT3,N+) open surgery is still recommended.

摘要

目的

1991年,腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术被引入作为上尿路移行细胞癌的一种治疗选择。基于对当前文献的回顾和个人经验,我们希望分析该技术与开放手术相比的实际效果。

材料与方法

我们进行了MEDLINE/PubMed检索,并回顾了1991年至2004年间关于腹腔镜和开放肾输尿管切除术的文献(n = 1365例患者),包括同期在海尔布隆klinikum接受腹腔镜(n = 23)或开放肾输尿管切除术(n = 21)的45例患者的结果。比较了人口统计学、围手术期和随访数据。

结果

分析显示,腹腔镜组的手术时间略长(276.6对220.1分钟),但失血量显著减少(240.9对462.9毫升)。未观察到轻微(12.9%对14.1%)或严重并发症发生率的差异(5.6%对8.3%)。所有九项比较研究均显示腹腔镜检查后吗啡等效剂量显著减少。在所有十项比较系列中,腹腔镜检查后的住院时间较短,但只有六项系列的差异具有统计学意义。两组的膀胱复发率(24.0%对24.7%)、局部复发率(4.4%对6.3%)和远处转移率(15.5%对15.2%)无显著差异。实际的无病两年生存率(75.2%对76.2%)相似。在三个腹腔镜组(n = 113例患者)中,五年生存率平均为81.2%,在十个开放手术组(n = 681例患者)中为61%。在377例(1.6%)分析患者中报告了6例端口部位转移,发生在腹腔镜检查后3至12个月。

结论

开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术仍然是上尿路移行细胞癌治疗的金标准,然而,腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术具有微创手术的优势,且不会恶化肿瘤学结果。对于晚期肿瘤(pT3,N+),仍建议采用开放手术。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: is it better than open surgery?腹腔镜下肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌:它比开放手术更好吗?
Eur Urol. 2004 Dec;46(6):690-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.006.
2
Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: the Cleveland Clinic experience.腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌:克利夫兰诊所的经验
J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1513-22.
3
Oncologic control after open or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: a single center experience.开放性或腹腔镜下肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌后的肿瘤控制:单中心经验
Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.007.
4
The oncological results of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer are equal to those of open nephroureterectomy.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌的肿瘤学结果与开放性肾输尿管切除术相当。
BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(1):66-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07950.x. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
5
Outcomes of surgical treatment for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open nephroureterectomy.上尿路移行细胞癌的外科治疗结果:后腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术的比较
World J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan 15;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-3.
6
Comparative study of oncologic outcome of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and standard nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与标准肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌的肿瘤学结局比较研究
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):457-61. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.005.
7
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌。
Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):595-601.
8
Hand assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy: comparison with the open procedure.手辅助后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术:与开放手术的比较。
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):890-4; discussion 894. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000046453.38141.dd.
9
A comparison of the clinical outcome between open and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.开放性与手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路移行细胞癌的临床疗效比较。
BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):798-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05035.x.
10
Laparoscopic vs open radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: oncological outcomes and 5-year follow-up.腹腔镜与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:肿瘤学结局及5年随访
BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9):1274-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08594.x. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic surgery of the urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract single surgeon initial experience, 66 consecutive cases.机器人手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:单外科医生的初步经验,66 例连续病例。
BMC Urol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01629-y.
2
Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后的肿瘤学结局:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Aug 31;12(8):1351-1362. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-882. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a single-center cohort study.
腹腔镜与开放根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌的围手术期及肿瘤学结局:一项单中心队列研究
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(3):257-264. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.103. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.回顾性多中心研究比较腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路上皮癌的条件性癌症特异性生存。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0255965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255965. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparison of modified transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: initial experience.改良经脐单孔腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与后腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的比较:初步经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Mar;15(1):199-207. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.87492. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
6
Comparison of oncological and perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic nephroureterectomy approaches in patients with non-metastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.比较开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学和围手术期结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0210401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210401. eCollection 2019.
7
Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma - Update.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌——最新进展
Asian J Urol. 2016 Jul;3(3):115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Laparoscopic vs robotic nephroureterectomy: Is it time to re-establish the standard? Evidence from a systematic review.腹腔镜与机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术:是时候重新确立标准了吗?一项系统评价的证据
Arab J Urol. 2017 Jun 16;15(3):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.05.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.
9
Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.开放性与腹腔镜下及机器人辅助肾输尿管切除术的系统评价
Rev Urol. 2017;19(1):32-43. doi: 10.3909/riu0691.
10
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性和/或局部进展性上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学结果
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0202-x.