Hippisley-Cox Julia, O'Hanlon Shaun, Coupland Carol
Division of Primary Care, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG2 7RD.
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1267-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38279.588125.7C. Epub 2004 Nov 17.
To determine the effect of deprivation and ethnicity on the achievement of quality indicators for patients with diabetes and the extent of any inequalities between the sexes.
Population based cross sectional survey using electronic general practice records.
237 UK practices contributing to the QRESEARCH database.
54,180 patients with diabetes, derived from a population of 1.8 million patients.
Adjusted odds ratios for 18 indicators for diabetes from the new general medical services contract for UK general practitioners and comparisons between patients from the most deprived and most affluent fifths (areas of high and low ethnicity) and between men and women.
The prevalence of diabetes was 3.0%, and there was a large variation between practices in achievement of indicators. Compared with patients from affluent areas, those from deprived areas were less likely to have body mass index and smoking status recorded. They were also less likely to have records for HbA1c concentration; an HbA1c value < 7.5% or < 10%; retinal screening; blood pressure; testing for neuropathy or microalbuminuria, or flu vaccination. Compared with patients from areas of low ethnicity those from areas of high ethnicity were less likely to have many measures recorded. Women were significantly less likely to have records for body mass index; pulses; blood pressure values below 145/85 mm Hg; testing for microalbuminuria; serum cholesterol concentration; serum cholesterol values < 5 mmol/l; and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors given in the presence of proteinuria or microalbuminuria.
Practices in areas of high deprivation and high ethnicity will have to work harder to achieve the quality indicators for diabetes, and it is possible that those practices that most need the resources are the ones least likely to get them.
确定贫困程度和种族对糖尿病患者质量指标达成情况的影响以及性别间不平等的程度。
基于人群的横断面调查,使用电子全科医疗记录。
向QRESEARCH数据库提供数据的237家英国医疗机构。
从180万患者群体中选取的54180例糖尿病患者。
英国全科医生新的全科医疗服务合同中18项糖尿病指标的调整比值比,以及最贫困和最富裕五分之一人群(种族差异大的地区)之间以及男性和女性之间的患者比较。
糖尿病患病率为3.0%,各医疗机构在指标达成情况上存在很大差异。与富裕地区的患者相比,贫困地区的患者记录体重指数和吸烟状况的可能性较小。他们记录糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)浓度、HbA1c值<7.5%或<10%、视网膜筛查、血压、神经病变或微量白蛋白尿检测或流感疫苗接种情况的可能性也较小。与种族差异小的地区的患者相比,种族差异大的地区的患者记录多项指标的可能性较小。女性记录体重指数、脉搏、血压值低于145/85 mmHg、微量白蛋白尿检测、血清胆固醇浓度、血清胆固醇值<5 mmol/l以及在存在蛋白尿或微量白蛋白尿时给予血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的可能性显著较小。
高度贫困和种族差异大的地区的医疗机构必须更加努力才能实现糖尿病的质量指标,而最需要资源的医疗机构可能最不容易获得这些资源。