Hills Marcia D, Carroll Simon, O'Neill Michel
University of Victoria, Human and Social Development, BC, Canada.
Promot Educ. 2004;Spec no 1:17-21, 49.
The current systematic reviews to assess the effectiveness of community-based health promotion projects, be they quantitative (numerical meta-analyses) or qualitative (narrative reviews), both have significant drawbacks. Out of the work conducted for two initiatives, the developments for the Global programme on health promotion effectiveness carried at by the North American Region out of the International Union of Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE), as well as the work conducted for the ECIP (effectiveness of community interventions project) of Health Canada, a new way to approach the issue of effectiveness is proposed. Based on a "realist synthesis" epistemological position, this approach has led us to the first formulation of a framework aiming at identifying the mechanisms that explain why local programs are successful.
目前用于评估基于社区的健康促进项目有效性的系统评价,无论是定量的(数值荟萃分析)还是定性的(叙述性综述),都存在重大缺陷。在为两项倡议开展的工作中,即国际健康促进与教育联盟(IUHPE)北美地区开展的全球健康促进有效性计划,以及加拿大卫生部的社区干预项目有效性(ECIP)所开展的工作中,提出了一种处理有效性问题的新方法。基于“现实主义综合”的认识论立场,这种方法使我们首次制定了一个框架,旨在确定解释地方项目为何成功的机制。