Suppr超能文献

初级保健机构将患者转诊至运动项目一年后是否会增加身体活动量?一项随机对照试验。

Does primary care referral to an exercise programme increase physical activity one year later? A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Harrison Roger A, Roberts Chris, Elton Peter J

机构信息

Bolton Primary Care Trust, St Peters House, Silverwell Street, Bolton BL1 1PP, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Mar;27(1):25-32. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh197. Epub 2004 Nov 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a primary care referral scheme on increasing physical activity at 1 year from referral. Design Two-group randomized controlled trial recruiting primary care referrals to a borough-based exercise scheme. Setting A local authority borough in the north-west of England. Participants 545 patients defined as sedentary by a primary care practitioner. Intervention Referral to a local-authority exercise referral scheme and written information compared with written information only. Main outcome measures Meeting physical activity target at 12 months following referral, with a secondary outcome measured at 6 months from referral.

RESULTS

At 12 months, a non-significant increase of 5 per cent was observed in the intervention compared with control group, for participation in at least 90 minutes of moderate/vigorous activity per week (25.8 versus 20.4 per cent, OR 1.45, 0.84 to 2.50, p = 0.18). At 6 months, a 10 per cent treatment effect was observed which was significant (22.6 versus 13.6 per cent, OR 1.67, 1.08 to 2.60, p = 0.05). The intervention increased satisfaction with information but this did not influence adherence with physical activity.

CONCLUSION

Community-based physical activity referral schemes have some impact on reducing sedentary behaviour in the short-term, but which is unlikely to be sustained and lead to benefits in terms of health.

摘要

目的

评估初级保健转诊计划在转诊后1年增加身体活动方面的有效性。设计两组随机对照试验,招募初级保健转诊患者参加基于行政区的锻炼计划。地点:英格兰西北部的一个地方当局行政区。参与者:545名被初级保健医生定义为久坐不动的患者。干预措施:转诊至地方当局的运动转诊计划并提供书面信息,与仅提供书面信息进行比较。主要结局指标:转诊后12个月达到身体活动目标,次要结局指标在转诊后6个月测量。

结果

在12个月时,干预组与对照组相比,每周至少参加90分钟中等强度/剧烈活动的参与率非显著增加5%(25.8%对20.4%,OR 1.45,0.84至2.50,p = 0.18)。在6个月时,观察到10%的治疗效果,具有显著性(22.6%对13.6%,OR 1.67,1.08至2.60,p = 0.05)。干预提高了对信息的满意度,但这并未影响对身体活动的坚持。

结论

基于社区的身体活动转诊计划在短期内对减少久坐行为有一定影响,但这种影响不太可能持续,也不太可能在健康方面带来益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验