Suppr超能文献

获得运动转诊计划——基于人群的分析。

Access to exercise referral schemes -- a population based analysis.

作者信息

Harrison R A, McNair F, Dugdill L

机构信息

Evidence for Population Health Unit, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Dec;27(4):326-30. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi048. Epub 2005 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sedentary behaviour is a public health priority in many countries. Hundreds of community-based exercise referral schemes have been established in Europe and USA, to increase physical activity. Experimental evidence questions the effectiveness of these schemes. No previous evaluations have considered a population approach nor provide detailed information on the types of people accessing these schemes. This is of concern given increasing health inequalities in other areas of care. Our register-based study quantified the numbers and characteristics of patients referred and accessing a district-wide exercise referral scheme. The analysis considers the effectiveness of these schemes to a geographically defined population.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively from a patient register for referrals made to a district-wide exercise referral scheme in north-west England. Analysis examined referral rates and the influence of practitioner and patient characteristics on access to the scheme.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, 6,610 adults were referred from 125 general practices, with 60.8 per cent female and a mean age of 51.3 years (SD 12.6). This represents 4 per cent of the adult sedentary population in that district. The most common reason for referral was musculoskeletal or cardiovascular risk. Overall, 79 per cent attended at least the first appointment, with statistically significant predictors by age and reason for referral. Those referred for 'fitness' or 'mental health' were most likely to attend. Patients in the youngest and oldest age groups were least likely to attend. Patient's sex and deprivation and the number of patients referred by each general practice did not influence attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary-care patients seem to view the concept of exercise referral schemes positively but practitioners remain reluctant to refer many of their sedentary patients. There is doubt that exercise referral schemes like this will influence population levels of sedentary behaviour, when considered alongside their impact on physical activity in the longer term.

摘要

背景

久坐行为在许多国家都是公共卫生的重点问题。欧洲和美国已经建立了数百个基于社区的运动转诊计划,以增加身体活动量。实验证据对这些计划的有效性提出了质疑。以前的评估都没有考虑到人群方法,也没有提供关于使用这些计划的人群类型的详细信息。鉴于其他护理领域的健康不平等现象日益加剧,这令人担忧。我们基于登记册的研究对转诊并使用全区运动转诊计划的患者数量和特征进行了量化。该分析考虑了这些计划对地理定义人群的有效性。

方法

前瞻性地从英格兰西北部全区运动转诊计划的患者登记册中收集数据。分析检查了转诊率以及从业者和患者特征对使用该计划的影响。

结果

在5年多的时间里,125家全科诊所转诊了6610名成年人,其中60.8%为女性,平均年龄为51.3岁(标准差12.6)。这占该地区成年久坐人群的4%。转诊的最常见原因是肌肉骨骼或心血管风险。总体而言,79%的人至少参加了第一次预约,年龄和转诊原因有统计学上的显著预测因素。因“健康”或“心理健康”转诊的人最有可能参加。最年轻和最年长年龄组中的患者参加的可能性最小。患者的性别、贫困程度以及每家全科诊所转诊的患者数量均未影响就诊率。

结论

初级保健患者似乎对运动转诊计划的概念持积极态度,但从业者仍然不愿意转诊他们的许多久坐患者。考虑到这类运动转诊计划对长期身体活动的影响,怀疑它们是否会影响久坐行为的人群水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验