• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对美国预防服务工作组建议的认同度。

Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.

作者信息

Stange K C, Kelly R, Chao J, Zyzanski S J, Shank J C, Jaén C R, Melnikow J, Flocke S

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Fairview General Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1992 Apr;34(4):409-16.

PMID:1556535
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No large-scale work has yet assessed the reactions of physicians to the report of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), despite its potential for fostering a consensus among practitioners. This study undertook a survey of family physicians to assess their agreement with the recommendations of the Task Force.

METHODS

A survey containing the verbatim summary recommendations of the USPSTF was mailed to all 1784 active members of the Ohio Academy of Family Physicians.

RESULTS

No evidence of selection bias was found among the 898 responding physicians. The average physician agreed with 88% of the recommendations. For a number of recommendations, however, particularly those in which the Task Force differed with the American Cancer Society, there was a high level of disagreement. Physician disagreement with the recommendations was associated with older age, not having completed a residency, male sex, less prior exposure to the USPSTF guidelines, and greater perception of the impracticality of applying them.

CONCLUSIONS

The high level of agreement with most USPSTF recommendations implies that they represent an emerging consensus about which preventive services should be delivered. Attempts at USPSTF guideline dissemination should focus on recommendations with high agreement. Additional research is needed to assess the reasons for disagreement.

摘要

背景

尽管美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的报告有可能促进从业者之间达成共识,但尚未有大规模研究评估医生对该报告的反应。本研究对家庭医生进行了一项调查,以评估他们对工作组建议的认同程度。

方法

一份包含USPSTF逐字总结建议的调查问卷被邮寄给俄亥俄州家庭医生学会的所有1784名在职会员。

结果

在898名回复的医生中未发现选择偏倚的证据。医生平均认同88%的建议。然而,对于一些建议,尤其是那些工作组与美国癌症协会存在分歧的建议,存在高度的不同意见。医生对建议的不同意见与年龄较大、未完成住院医师培训、男性、较少接触过USPSTF指南以及更多地认为应用这些建议不切实际有关。

结论

对大多数USPSTF建议的高度认同意味着它们代表了关于应提供哪些预防服务的一种新兴共识。USPSTF指南的传播应侧重于高度认同的建议。需要进行更多研究以评估不同意见的原因。

相似文献

1
Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.医生对美国预防服务工作组建议的认同度。
J Fam Pract. 1992 Apr;34(4):409-16.
2
Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.家庭医生对美国预防服务工作组建议的不同意见。
J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):140-7.
3
How do family physicians prioritize delivery of multiple preventive services?家庭医生如何对提供多种预防服务进行优先级排序?
J Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;38(3):231-7.
4
Cancer screening guideline preference surveys: physicians' perceptions of the American Cancer Society.癌症筛查指南偏好调查:医生对美国癌症协会的看法
Tenn Med. 1998 Jan;91(1):17-20.
5
Implementing the US preventive services guidelines in a family practice residency.在家庭医学住院医师培训中实施美国预防服务指南。
Fam Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;25(7):447-51.
6
Provision of preventive care to unannounced standardized patients.为未预约的标准化患者提供预防保健服务。
CMAJ. 1998 Jan 27;158(2):185-93.
7
Awareness of consensus preventive medicine practice guidelines among primary care physicians.基层医疗医生对共识性预防医学实践指南的认知情况。
Am J Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;13(1):45-50.
8
Consensus guidelines: improving the delivery of clinical preventive services.共识指南:改善临床预防服务的提供
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):300-7. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318767.36901.0b.
9
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
10
Do female primary care physicians practise preventive care differently from their male colleagues?女性初级保健医生在预防保健方面的做法与男性同事不同吗?
Can Fam Physician. 1996 Dec;42:2370-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.全肩关节置换术中现代金属小梁背衬型关节盂组件:证据是什么?一项系统评价。
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Feb;13(1):29-37. doi: 10.1177/1758573220914277. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
Multiple clinical practice guidelines for breast and cervical cancer screening: perceptions of US primary care physicians.多项乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查临床实践指南:美国初级保健医生的看法。
Med Care. 2011 Feb;49(2):139-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318202858e.
3
The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.
早期类风湿关节炎一线改善病情抗风湿药物选择中实践与指南之间的差距:ESPOIR队列研究结果
J Rheumatol. 2009 May;36(5):934-42. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080762. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
4
A process evaluation of an intervention to improve respiratory infection control practices in family physician offices.一项旨在改善家庭医生诊所呼吸道感染控制措施的干预措施的过程评估。
Can J Public Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;97(6):475-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03405231.
5
Implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian Hypertension Education Program.高血压相关建议的实施:加拿大高血压教育计划
Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):595-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70281-1.
6
[Population-related and individual prevention. Strategies and effectiveness].[与人群相关的和个体预防。策略与效果]
Internist (Berl). 2004 Feb;45(2):148-56. doi: 10.1007/s00108-003-1138-7.
7
Preventive screening. What factors influence testing?预防性筛查。哪些因素会影响检测?
Can Fam Physician. 2002 Sep;48:1494-501.
8
Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care.从证据到行动:一种量身定制的多方面方法,用于改变家庭医生的执业模式并改善预防保健。
CMAJ. 2001 Mar 20;164(6):757-63.
9
The impact of referral to a primary physician on cervical cancer screening.转诊至初级医师对宫颈癌筛查的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2001 Mar;91(3):451-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.3.451.
10
Put prevention into practice: a controlled evaluation.将预防措施付诸实践:一项对照评估。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1622-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1622.