Jaeger M, Soehle M, Schuhmann M U, Winkler D, Meixensberger J
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jan;147(1):51-6; discussion 56. doi: 10.1007/s00701-004-0408-z.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between continuously monitored regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) and brain tissue oxygen (PtiO2).
Continuous advanced multimodal neuromonitoring including monitoring of PtiO2 (Licox, GMS) and CBF (QFlow, Hemedex) was performed in eight patients after severe subarachnoid haemorrhage (n=5) and traumatic brain injury (n=3) for an average of 9.6 days. Parameters were measured using a flexible polarographic PtiO2-probe and a thermal diffusion CBF-microprobe.
Regarding the whole monitoring period in all patients, the data indicated a significant correlation between CBF and PtiO2 (r=0.36). In 72% of 400 analysed intervals of 30 minutes duration with PtiO2 changes larger than 5 mmHg, a strong correlation between CBF and PtiO2 existed (r>0.6). In 19% of intervals a still statistically significant correlation was observed (0.3<r<0.6). During the remaining 9% no correlation was found (r<0.3). Regarding the clinical stability of the monitoring devices, the CBF monitoring system allowed monitoring of CBF in 64% of the time when PtiO2 monitoring was possible only. Phases of non-monitoring were mostly due to fever of the patient, when the system does not allow monitoring to avoid overheating of the cerebral tissue.
This study suggests a correlation between CBF and PtiO2. The level of PtiO2 seems to be predominately determined by regional CBF, since changes in PtiO2 were correlated in 90% of episodes to simultaneous changes of CBF.
本研究旨在探讨持续监测的局部脑血流量(CBF)与脑组织氧分压(PtiO2)之间的关系。
对8例重症蛛网膜下腔出血患者(n = 5)和创伤性脑损伤患者(n = 3)进行持续的多模态神经监测,包括监测PtiO2(Licox,GMS)和CBF(QFlow,Hemedex),平均监测时间为9.6天。使用柔性极谱PtiO2探头和热扩散CBF微探头测量参数。
在所有患者的整个监测期间,数据表明CBF与PtiO2之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.36)。在400个持续30分钟且PtiO2变化大于5 mmHg的分析时间段中,72%的时间段CBF与PtiO2存在强相关性(r>0.6)。在19%的时间段中仍观察到具有统计学意义的相关性(0.3<r<0.6)。在其余9%的时间段中未发现相关性(r<0.3)。关于监测设备的临床稳定性,在仅能进行PtiO2监测的64%的时间里,CBF监测系统能够监测CBF。非监测阶段主要是由于患者发热,此时系统不允许监测以避免脑组织过热。
本研究表明CBF与PtiO2之间存在相关性。PtiO2水平似乎主要由局部CBF决定,因为在90%的情况下,PtiO2的变化与CBF的同时变化相关。