Stein Murray B, Sherbourne Cathy D, Craske Michelle G, Means-Christensen Adrienne, Bystritsky Alexander, Katon Wayne, Sullivan Greer, Roy-Byrne Peter P
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0985, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2230-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.12.2230.
This study evaluated quality of care for primary care patients with anxiety disorders in university-affiliated outpatient clinics in Los Angeles, San Diego, and Seattle.
Three hundred sixty-six primary care outpatients who were diagnosed with panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (with or without major depression) were surveyed about care received in the prior 3 months. Quality indicators were mental health referral, anxiety counseling, and use of appropriate antianxiety medication during the previous 3 months.
Approximately one-third of patients with anxiety disorders had received counseling from their primary care provider in the prior 3 months. Fewer than 10% had receiving counseling from a mental health professional that included multiple elements of cognitive behavior therapy. Approximately 40% had received appropriate antianxiety medications in the previous 3 months, although only 25% had received them at a minimally adequate dose and duration. Overall, fewer than one in three patients had received either psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy that met a criterion for quality care. In multivariate analyses, patients with comorbid depression and/or medical illness were more likely-and patients from ethnic minorities were less likely-to receive appropriate antianxiety medications.
Rates of quality care for anxiety disorders are moderate to low in university-affiliated primary care practices. Although an appropriate type of pharmacotherapy was frequently used, it was often of inadequate duration. Cognitive behavior therapy was markedly underused. These findings emphasize the need for practice guidelines and implementation of quality improvement programs for anxiety disorders in primary care.
本研究评估了洛杉矶、圣地亚哥和西雅图大学附属医院门诊中焦虑症初级护理患者的护理质量。
对366名被诊断患有惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍、社交恐惧症和/或创伤后应激障碍(伴或不伴重度抑郁症)的初级护理门诊患者进行了调查,询问他们在过去3个月中接受的护理情况。质量指标包括心理健康转诊、焦虑咨询以及过去3个月内适当抗焦虑药物的使用情况。
在过去3个月中,约三分之一的焦虑症患者接受了初级护理提供者的咨询。不到10%的患者接受了包括多种认知行为治疗要素的心理健康专业人员的咨询。在过去3个月中,约40%的患者接受了适当的抗焦虑药物治疗,尽管只有25%的患者接受的药物剂量和疗程达到最低适当标准。总体而言,不到三分之一的患者接受了符合优质护理标准的心理治疗或药物治疗。在多变量分析中,合并抑郁症和/或患有内科疾病的患者更有可能——而少数族裔患者则不太可能——接受适当的抗焦虑药物治疗。
在大学附属初级护理机构中,焦虑症的优质护理率为中度到低度。虽然经常使用适当类型的药物治疗,但疗程往往不足。认知行为疗法的使用明显不足。这些发现强调了制定初级护理中焦虑症实践指南和实施质量改进计划的必要性。