• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于广泛性焦虑症的简要在线及离线(纸笔)筛查工具:焦虑症心理健康筛查工具(MHS:A)开发与验证的最后阶段

A Brief Online and Offline (Paper-and-Pencil) Screening Tool for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The Final Phase in the Development and Validation of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A).

作者信息

Kim Shin-Hyang, Park Kiho, Yoon Seowon, Choi Younyoung, Lee Seung-Hwan, Choi Kee-Hong

机构信息

School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

KU Mind Health Institute, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:639366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639366. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639366
PMID:33692730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937919/
Abstract

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) can cause significant socioeconomic burden and daily life dysfunction; hence, therapeutic intervention through early detection is important. This study was the final stage of a 3-year anxiety screening tool development project that evaluated the psychometric properties and diagnostic screening utility of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A), which measures GAD. A total of 527 Koreans completed online and offline (i.e., paper-and pencil) versions of the MHS: A, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The participants had an average age of 38.6 years and included 340 (64.5%) females. Participants were also administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Internal consistency, convergent/criterion validity, item characteristics, and test information were assessed based on the item response theory (IRT), and a factor analysis and cut-off score analyses were conducted. The MHS: A had good internal consistency and good convergent validity with other anxiety scales. The two versions (online/offline) of the MHS: A were nearly identical ( = 0.908). It had a one-factor structure and showed better diagnostic accuracy (online/offline: sensitivity = 0.98/0.90, specificity = 0.80/0.83) for GAD detection than the GAD-7 and BAI. The IRT analysis indicated that the MHS: A was most informative as a screening tool for GAD. The MHS: A can serve as a clinically useful screening tool for GAD in Korea. Furthermore, it can be administered both online and offline and can be flexibly used as a brief mental health screener, especially with the current rise in telehealth.

摘要

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)会导致巨大的社会经济负担和日常生活功能障碍;因此,通过早期检测进行治疗干预很重要。本研究是一项为期3年的焦虑筛查工具开发项目的最后阶段,该项目评估了用于测量GAD的焦虑症心理健康筛查工具(MHS:A)的心理测量特性和诊断筛查效用。共有527名韩国人完成了MHS:A、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表(GAD-7)和宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷(PSWQ)的在线和离线(即纸笔)版本。参与者的平均年龄为38.6岁,其中包括340名(64.5%)女性。参与者还接受了迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI)。基于项目反应理论(IRT)评估了内部一致性、收敛/标准效度、项目特征和测试信息,并进行了因子分析和截断分数分析。MHS:A具有良好的内部一致性,与其他焦虑量表具有良好的收敛效度。MHS:A的两个版本(在线/离线)几乎相同(=0.908)。它具有单因素结构,在检测GAD方面比GAD-7和BAI具有更高的诊断准确性(在线/离线:敏感性=0.98/0.90,特异性=0.80/0.83)。IRT分析表明,MHS:A作为GAD的筛查工具信息最丰富。MHS:A可作为韩国临床上有用的GAD筛查工具。此外,它既可以在线管理,也可以离线管理,并且可以灵活地用作简短的心理健康筛查工具,尤其是在当前远程医疗兴起的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/c91f1c9cf115/fpsyg-12-639366-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/938227e5c3b6/fpsyg-12-639366-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/2fc20f721e00/fpsyg-12-639366-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/32f293079e76/fpsyg-12-639366-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/bfff00f9f07a/fpsyg-12-639366-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/c91f1c9cf115/fpsyg-12-639366-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/938227e5c3b6/fpsyg-12-639366-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/2fc20f721e00/fpsyg-12-639366-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/32f293079e76/fpsyg-12-639366-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/bfff00f9f07a/fpsyg-12-639366-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bed3/7937919/c91f1c9cf115/fpsyg-12-639366-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Brief Online and Offline (Paper-and-Pencil) Screening Tool for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The Final Phase in the Development and Validation of the Mental Health Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders (MHS: A).一种用于广泛性焦虑症的简要在线及离线(纸笔)筛查工具:焦虑症心理健康筛查工具(MHS:A)开发与验证的最后阶段
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:639366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639366. eCollection 2021.
2
Final validation of the mental health screening tool for depressive disorders: A brief online and offline screening tool for major depressive disorder.抑郁症心理健康筛查工具的最终验证:一种用于重度抑郁症的简短在线和离线筛查工具。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 5;13:992068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992068. eCollection 2022.
3
[Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].[担忧评估:宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2001 Sep-Oct;27(5):475-84.
4
Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders: Development and Validation of the Korean Anxiety Screening Assessment.焦虑症筛查工具:韩国焦虑筛查评估的开发与验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Nov;15(11):1053-1063. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.09.27.2. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Rapid detection of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in epilepsy: Validation of the GAD-7 as a complementary tool to the NDDI-E in a French sample.癫痫患者中广泛性焦虑障碍和重度抑郁症的快速检测:在法国样本中验证GAD-7作为NDDI-E补充工具的有效性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Apr;57(Pt A):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
6
Psychometric comparison of the generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for measuring response during treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7 与宾夕法尼亚州担心问卷在广泛性焦虑障碍治疗中测量反应的心理测量学比较。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2011;40(3):216-27. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2011.582138. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
7
Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale in an acute psychiatric sample.广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表在急性精神病样本中的有效性。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):456-64. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1802. Epub 2012 May 17.
8
Validation of the generalized anxiety disorder scales (GAD-7 and GAD-2) in primary care settings in Latvia.拉脱维亚初级保健机构中广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD - 7和GAD - 2)的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 6;13:972628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.972628. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale in youth: Screening in a primary care sample.广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表在青少年中的心理测量学特性:在初级保健样本中的筛查。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;33(4):241-250. doi: 10.12788/acp.0047.
10
Psychometric properties of abbreviated and ultra-brief versions of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷简化版和超简版的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec;26(4):1146-54. doi: 10.1037/a0037251. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening mental health risks for adolescents in South Korea.韩国青少年心理健康风险筛查
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1589136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1589136. eCollection 2025.
2
The feasibility of a two-day intensive forest therapy incorporating mindfulness practices for natural disaster-affected individuals: a brief report.针对受自然灾害影响个体开展为期两天并融入正念练习的强化森林疗法的可行性:简要报告
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1603924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1603924. eCollection 2025.
3
Longitudinal relationships between daily activities, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a three-wave cross-lagged study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of GAD-7 and GAD-2.韩国版广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和广泛性焦虑障碍简易量表(GAD-2)的心理测量特性及临床效用
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 18;10:127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00127. eCollection 2019.
2
Clinical Utility of Beck Anxiety Inventory in Clinical and Nonclinical Korean Samples.贝克焦虑量表在韩国临床和非临床样本中的临床效用。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 4;9:666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00666. eCollection 2018.
3
Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders: Development and Validation of the Korean Anxiety Screening Assessment.
新冠疫情期间日常活动、抑郁症状、焦虑和自杀倾向之间的纵向关系:一项三波交叉滞后研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;13:1459300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1459300. eCollection 2025.
4
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and 2-item (GAD-2) scales for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的广泛性焦虑障碍7项(GAD - 7)和2项(GAD - 2)量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD015455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015455.
5
Effectiveness of social and therapeutic horticulture for reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社会与治疗性园艺对减轻抑郁和焦虑症状的有效性:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 16;15:1507354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1507354. eCollection 2024.
6
Clinical Implication of Maumgyeol Basic Biotypes-Electroencephalography- and Photoplethysmogram-Based Bwave State Inventory.基于毛厥基本生物型、脑电图和光电容积脉搏波图的B波状态量表的临床意义
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 May;21(5):528-538. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0381. Epub 2024 May 23.
7
Development and validation of the core life activities scale.核心生活活动量表的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 22;15:1359276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359276. eCollection 2024.
8
The mechanisms of nature-based therapy on depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction: examining mindfulness in a two-wave mediation model.基于自然疗法对抑郁、焦虑、压力和生活满意度的作用机制:在双波中介模型中检验正念
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 22;14:1330207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330207. eCollection 2023.
9
The effectiveness of nature-based therapy for community psychological distress and well-being during COVID-19: a multi-site trial.基于自然的疗法在 COVID-19 期间对社区心理困扰和幸福感的有效性:一项多地点试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 16;13(1):22370. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49702-0.
10
Clinical Implication of Maumgyeol Basic Service-the 2 Channel Electroencephalography and a Photoplethysmogram-based Mental Health Evaluation Software.毛觉基础服务的临床意义——双通道脑电图和基于光电容积脉搏波描记图的心理健康评估软件
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Aug 31;21(3):583-593. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1062.
焦虑症筛查工具:韩国焦虑筛查评估的开发与验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Nov;15(11):1053-1063. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.09.27.2. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Barriers to mental health treatment among individuals with social anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.社交焦虑障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍患者的心理健康治疗障碍。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):5-12. doi: 10.1037/ser0000254. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Psychometric analysis of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) in primary care using modern item response theory.使用现代项目反应理论对基层医疗中广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)进行心理测量分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182162. eCollection 2017.
6
Cross-sectional Comparison of the Epidemiology of DSM-5 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Across the Globe.全球范围内《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版广泛性焦虑障碍流行病学的横断面比较
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):465-475. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0056.
7
The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.拥有两块手表的问题:当RMSEA和CFI出现分歧时拟合度的评估
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Mar-Jun;51(2-3):220-39. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
8
Validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and GAD-2 in patients with migraine.偏头痛患者中广泛性焦虑障碍-7(GAD-7)和广泛性焦虑障碍-2(GAD-2)的验证
J Headache Pain. 2015;16:97. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0583-8. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
Cultural-based biases of the GAD-7.广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)的文化偏倚。
J Anxiety Disord. 2015 Apr;31:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
10
Validity and clinical interpretability of Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS).总体焦虑严重程度和功能损害量表(OASIS)的效度及临床可解释性。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jan 1;170:217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.045. Epub 2014 Sep 3.