Lam Linda C W, Lui Victor W C, Chiu Helen F K, Chan Sandra S M, Tam Cindy W C
Department of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2005;19(2-3):86-90. doi: 10.1159/000082354. Epub 2004 Nov 29.
The neurocognitive profile of community-dwelling Chinese subjects with 'questionable' dementia was studied.
One hundred and fifty-four ambulatory Chinese subjects were recruited from local social centers for the elderly. Each subject was examined using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), the Cantonese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (CMMSE), the Chinese version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Category Verbal Fluency Test (CVFT), digit and visual span tests, and the Cambridge Neurological Inventory. The neurocognitive profile of nondemented subjects (CDR 0) was compared with that of subjects with 'questionable' dementia (CDR 0.5).
Subjects with 'questionable' dementia were older, and had lower educational levels and global cognitive assessment scores than the controls (CMMSE and ADAS-Cog; t tests, p < 0.001). In addition, they also had significantly lower scores in delayed recall, reverse span, verbal fluency tests and worse performance in complex motor tasks related to executive function (Mann-Whitney tests, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that ADAS-Cog, CVFT, and reverse visual span were significant predictors for the CDR of 'questionable' dementia.
Aside from memory impairment, executive function deficits were also present in subjects with 'questionable' dementia. To identify groups cognitively at risk for dementia, concomitant assessments of memory and executive function are suggested.
对社区居住的有“可疑”痴呆的中国受试者的神经认知特征进行了研究。
从当地老年社会中心招募了154名能走动的中国受试者。对每名受试者使用临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)、粤语版简易精神状态检查表(CMMSE)、中文版阿尔茨海默病评估量表 - 认知分量表(ADAS - Cog)、类别言语流畅性测试(CVFT)、数字和视觉广度测试以及剑桥神经学检查表进行检查。将非痴呆受试者(CDR 0)的神经认知特征与有“可疑”痴呆的受试者(CDR 0.5)的神经认知特征进行比较。
有“可疑”痴呆的受试者比对照组年龄更大,教育水平更低,整体认知评估得分更低(CMMSE和ADAS - Cog;t检验,p < 0.001)。此外,他们在延迟回忆、倒背广度、言语流畅性测试中的得分也显著更低,在与执行功能相关的复杂运动任务中的表现更差(Mann - Whitney检验,p < 0.001)。逻辑回归分析显示,ADAS - Cog、CVFT和倒背视觉广度是“可疑”痴呆CDR的显著预测因素。
除记忆障碍外,有“可疑”痴呆的受试者还存在执行功能缺陷。为了识别有认知性痴呆风险的群体,建议同时评估记忆和执行功能。