Malterud K, Westin S, Laerum E
Seksjon for allmennmedisin Institutt for samfunnsmedisinske fag Universitetet i Bergen.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Feb 20;112(5):673-5.
Discussions have taken place about relevant criteria for "scientific publications". That such criteria exist is apparent when faculties of medicine issue guidelines for classification and quantification of scientific publications. In this article the authors focus on lack of clarity and consistency in the prevailing classifications; for example, that the language in which it is published appears to be essential as such. Different disciplines must of necessity have a variety of forms of publication, depending on the target groups for the different publications. It is argued that classification and evaluation of scientific publications should be based on a more nauanced academic standpoint.
关于“科学出版物”的相关标准已经展开了讨论。当医学院发布科学出版物的分类和量化指南时，此类标准的存在就很明显了。在本文中，作者关注的是现行分类中缺乏清晰度和一致性；例如，出版物所使用的语言本身似乎至关重要。不同学科必然有多种出版形式，这取决于不同出版物的目标群体。有人认为，科学出版物的分类和评估应该基于一个更细致入微的学术立场。
