Sim L, Manthey K, Esdaile P, Benson M
Radiology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2004 Sep;27(3):148-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03178674.
A study to compare the performance of the following display monitors for application as PACS CR diagnostic workstations is described. 1. Diagnostic quality, 3 megapixel, 21 inch monochrome LCD monitors. 2. Commercial grade, 2 megapixel, 20 inch colour LCD monitors. Two sets of fifty radiological studies each were presented separately to five radiologists on two occasions, using different displays on each occasion. The two sets of radiological studies were CR of the chest, querying the presence of pneumothorax, and CR of the wrist, querying the presence of a scaphoid fracture. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for diagnostic performance for each presentation. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) for diagnosis using different monitors were compared for each image set and the following results obtained: Set 1: Monochrome AUC = 0.873 +/- 0.026; Colour AUC = 0.831 +/- 0.032; Set 2: Monochrome AUC = 0.945 +/- 0.014; Colour AUC = 0.931 +/- 0.019; Differences in AUC were attributed to the different monitors. While not significant at a 95% confidence level, the results have supported a cautious approach to consideration of the use of commercial grade LCD colour monitors for diagnostic application.
本文描述了一项比较以下几种显示器作为PACS CR诊断工作站的性能的研究。1. 诊断级质量、300万像素、21英寸单色液晶显示器。2. 商业级、200万像素、20英寸彩色液晶显示器。两组各50份放射学研究资料分两次分别呈现给5位放射科医生,每次使用不同的显示器。这两组放射学研究资料分别是胸部CR检查气胸的存在情况,以及腕部CR检查舟状骨骨折的存在情况。针对每次呈现的诊断性能构建了接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线。比较了使用不同显示器对每个图像集进行诊断时ROC曲线下的面积(AUC),并得到以下结果:第1组:单色AUC = 0.873±0.026;彩色AUC = 0.831±0.032;第2组:单色AUC = 0.945±0.014;彩色AUC = 0.931±0.019;AUC的差异归因于不同的显示器。虽然在95%置信水平下不显著,但结果支持在考虑将商业级液晶彩色显示器用于诊断应用时采取谨慎态度。