Meglino Bruce M, Korsgaard Audrey
Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):946-59. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.946.
In contrast with major theories of attitudes and behavior, the authors propose that individuals are not equally motivated to pursue their self-interests. The authors show that differences in other orientation affect the extent to which actions and attitudes reflect self-interested calculation (instrumental rationality) and the extent to which beliefs represent their external environment (epistemic rationality). These differences have consequences for processes underlying a wide range of attitudes and behavior typically assumed to be rationally self-interested. Thus, the authors' model exposes a common explanation for diverse organizational phenomena. It also clarifies inconsistencies surrounding the validity of certain attitudinal and motivational models, the relationship between job attitudes and actions, cross-cultural differences in attitudes and behavior, escalation of commitment, and the relationship between chief executive officer characteristics and organizational performance.
与主要的态度和行为理论不同,作者提出个体追求自身利益的动机并不相同。作者表明,他人导向的差异会影响行动和态度反映自身利益算计(工具理性)的程度,以及信念代表其外部环境(认知理性)的程度。这些差异对一系列通常被认为是理性自利的态度和行为背后的过程产生影响。因此,作者的模型揭示了对各种组织现象的一个共同解释。它还澄清了围绕某些态度和动机模型的有效性、工作态度与行动之间的关系、态度和行为的跨文化差异、承诺升级以及首席执行官特征与组织绩效之间的关系等方面的不一致之处。