Meglino Bruce M, Korsgaard M Audrey
Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1253-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1253.
The authors respond to C. K. W. De Dreu's (2006) critique of their article (B. M. Meglino & M. A. Korsgaard, 2004) published in the special section on Theoretical Models and Conceptual Analyses of the Journal of Applied Psychology. They maintain that De Dreu misinterprets their definitions and the psychological processes they addressed and thus raises a number of issues that are not relevant to their model. Meglino and Korsgaard's model focuses on the distinction between rational self-interest and other orientation, whereas the approach taken by De Dreu focuses on the distinction between rational self-interest and collective rationality. In this response, the authors clarify this distinction, address discrepancies between these two approaches, consider the effect of goals and rationality on other orientated behavior, and suggest directions for future research.
作者们回应了C. K. W. 德·德鲁（2006年）对他们发表于《应用心理学杂志》理论模型与概念分析特刊上的文章（B. M. 梅格利诺和M. A. 科斯加德，2004年）的批评。他们认为德·德鲁误解了他们的定义以及他们所探讨的心理过程，因此提出了一些与他们的模型无关的问题。梅格利诺和科斯加德的模型侧重于理性自我利益与他人导向之间的区别，而德·德鲁采用的方法则侧重于理性自我利益与集体理性之间的区别。在这一回应中，作者们阐明了这一区别，解决了这两种方法之间的差异，考虑了目标和理性对他人导向行为的影响，并提出了未来研究的方向。
