Pitney William A, Ehlers Greg G
Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL.
J Athl Train. 2004 Dec;39(4):344-351.
To gain insight regarding the mentoring processes involving students enrolled in athletic training education programs and to create a mentoring model. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a grounded theory study with students and mentors currently affiliated with 1 of 2 of the athletic training education programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen interviews were conducted, 13 with athletic training students and 3 with individuals identified as mentors. The students ranged in age from 20 to 24 years, with an average of 21.6 years. The mentors ranged from 24 to 38 years of age, with an average of 33.3 years. Participants were purposefully selected based on theoretic sampling and availability. DATA ANALYSIS: The transcribed interviews were analyzed using open-, axial-, and selective-coding procedures. Member checks, peer debriefings, and triangulation were used to ensure trustworthiness. RESULTS: Students who acknowledged having a mentor overwhelmingly identified their clinical instructor in this role. The open-coding procedures produced 3 categories: (1) mentoring prerequisites, (2) interpersonal foundations, and (3) educational dimensions. Mentoring prerequisites included accessibility, approachability, and protege initiative. Interpersonal foundations involved the mentor and protege having congruent values, trust, and a personal relationship. The educational dimensions category involved the mentor facilitating knowledge and skill development, encouraging professional perspectives, and individualizing learning. Although a student-certified athletic trainer relationship can be grounded in either interpersonal or educational aspects, the data support the occurrence of an authentic mentoring relationship when the dimensions coalesced. CONCLUSIONS: Potential mentors must not only be accessible but also approachable by a prospective protege. Mentoring takes initiative on behalf of a student and the mentor. A mentoring relationship is complex and involves the coalescence of both interpersonal and educational aspects of an affiliation. As a professional-socialization tactic, mentoring offers students a way to anticipate the future professional role in a very personal and meaningful way.
深入了解运动训练教育项目学生的指导过程,并创建一个指导模型。
我们对目前隶属于两个经联合健康职业教育认证委员会认证的运动训练教育项目之一的学生和导师进行了扎根理论研究。
进行了16次访谈,其中13次是与运动训练专业学生进行的,3次是与被认定为导师的个人进行的。学生年龄在20至24岁之间,平均年龄为21.6岁。导师年龄在24至38岁之间,平均年龄为33.3岁。参与者是根据理论抽样和可得性有目的地挑选出来的。
使用开放式编码、轴心式编码和选择性编码程序对转录的访谈进行分析。通过成员核对、同行汇报和三角验证来确保可信度。
绝大多数承认有导师的学生将他们的临床教师认定为这一角色。开放式编码程序产生了3个类别:(1)指导前提条件,(2)人际关系基础,(3)教育维度。指导前提条件包括可接近性、亲和性和被指导者的主动性。人际关系基础涉及导师和被指导者有一致的价值观、信任以及个人关系。教育维度类别涉及导师促进知识和技能发展、鼓励专业视角以及个性化学习。虽然学生认证的运动训练师关系可以基于人际关系或教育方面,但数据支持当这些维度融合时会出现真正的指导关系。
潜在的导师不仅必须是可接近的,而且必须让潜在的被指导者能够接近。指导需要代表学生和导师采取主动行动。指导关系是复杂的,涉及到一种关系中人际关系和教育方面的融合。作为一种职业社会化策略,指导为学生提供了一种以非常个人化和有意义的方式预期未来职业角色的途径。