Suppr超能文献

透析患者健康相关生活质量的不同评估

Different evaluations of the health related quality of life in dialysis patients.

作者信息

Rebollo Pablo, Alvarez-Ude Fernando, Valdés Covadonga, Estébanez Carmen

机构信息

Health Outcomes Research Unit, Nephrology Unit-1, Central University Hospital of Asturias and Institute Reina Sofia for Nephrological Research of the FRIAT, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):833-40.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sometimes patients on dialysis treatment cannot express their health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and therefore, it is necessary to use the assessment made by their carers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the agreement between dialysis patients' HRQoL and the assessment made by their carers, and to investigate which variables were associated with the differences found.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-two pairs of patients and carers were selected from 14 dialysis units. Patients' HRQoL was evaluated by the patients themselves and by their family carer (FAM), nurse (NUR) and physician (PH) using the Karnofsky scale (KS) and the EuroQOL5D (EQ5D) scale. Patients and their family carers answered the Medical Outcome Survey 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the family carers answered the Zarit burden interview. Physicians scored the patients' comorbidity index and nurses evaluated the Barthel index (BI).

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the ratings provided by patients and their carers were: KS: 0.80(FAM), 0.76(NUR) and 0.62(PH); EQ5D: 0.42(FAM), 0.48(NUR) and 0.29(PH). The agreement between the EQ5D dimension scores varied from moderate for mobility and self-care to insignificant for pain and anxiety/depression. The variables associated to the size of the differences found were the Zarit burden interview score and the mental component score (MCS) (SF-36) of the carer, the physical component score (PCS) (SF-36), the BI score and patient comorbidity, and the physician's age and experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Family carers and health care providers of dialysis patients are reasonably aware of the patient's level of function and well being and can be useful sources of proxy HRQoL information. Nevertheless, discrepancies can occur, depending in part on the different characteristics of patients and their caregivers.

摘要

背景

有时接受透析治疗的患者无法表达其与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL);因此,有必要采用其护理人员所做的评估。本研究的目的是评估透析患者的HRQoL与护理人员评估之间的一致性,并调查哪些变量与所发现的差异相关。

方法

从14个透析单位选取了222对患者与护理人员。使用卡诺夫斯基量表(KS)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ5D),由患者本人及其家庭护理人员(FAM)、护士(NUR)和医生(PH)对患者的HRQoL进行评估。患者及其家庭护理人员回答医学结局调查简表36项健康调查(SF - 36),家庭护理人员回答扎里特负担访谈量表。医生对患者的合并症指数进行评分,护士评估巴氏指数(BI)。

结果

患者及其护理人员评分之间的组内相关系数(ICC)为:KS:0.80(FAM),0.76(NUR)和0.62(PH);EQ5D:0.42(FAM),0.48(NUR)和0.29(PH)。EQ5D维度得分之间的一致性从中度(活动能力和自我护理方面)到不显著(疼痛和焦虑/抑郁方面)不等。与所发现差异大小相关的变量有扎里特负担访谈得分、护理人员的心理成分得分(MCS)(SF - 36)、身体成分得分(PCS)(SF - 36)、BI得分、患者合并症,以及医生的年龄和经验。

结论

透析患者的家庭护理人员和医疗保健提供者对患者的功能水平和健康状况有一定程度的了解,可作为HRQoL替代信息的有用来源。然而,仍可能出现差异,部分取决于患者及其护理人员的不同特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验