MacDonald Roderick, Wilt Timothy J, Howe R William
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, the Cochrane Review Group in Prostate Diseases and Urologic Cancers, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis 55417, USA.
BJU Int. 2004 Dec;94(9):1263-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05154.x.
To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of doxazosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compatible with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
Randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis if: the study duration was > or = 1 month; the study involved men with symptomatic BPO; and doxazosin was compared with placebo or active controls. Study and patient characteristics and outcome data were extracted in duplicate onto standardized forms using a prospectively developed protocol.
Thirteen studies involving 6033 men with (mean age 64 years) met the inclusion criteria; 10 were placebo-controlled, including two with combined doxazosin/finasteride therapy and finasteride monotherapy arms. Three trials were a comparison with other alpha-blockers. The study duration was 1-54 months. The mean baseline symptom scores and peak urinary flow (PUF) rates were indicative of moderate BPO. Doxazosin gave significant improvements in LUTS, assessed by symptom scores, vs placebo and finasteride in the short- to long-term. Two long-term studies (1 and 4 years) reported mean changes from baseline for the International Prostate Symptom Score of - 8.3 and - 6.6 points (-49% and - 39%) for doxazosin and - 5.7 and - 4.9 points (-33% and - 29%) for placebo, respectively. Doxazosin significantly increased PUF rates vs placebo. In pooled results from three studies, the weighted mean difference in the mean change from baseline vs placebo was 1.6 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.1). Efficacy was comparable with other alpha1-blockers. In the long-term (>4 years) doxazosin was no better then finasteride in improving PUF. Combined doxazosin and finasteride significantly reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of BPO vs each drug separately in men followed for >4 years. Absolute risk reductions vs placebo were 11.3%, 6.9% and 6.4% for combined therapy, doxazosin and finasteride, respectively (P < 0.001). Improvements in symptom scores and PUF were also significantly greater with combined than monotherapy, and the former reduced the need for invasive treatment for BPO and the risk of long-term urinary retention, although the absolute reductions in risk vs placebo were small (<4%). Dizziness and fatigue were significantly more common with doxazosin than placebo (11% vs 7%, and 6% vs 3%, respectively). Adverse events reported for combined therapy were similar to those with each monotherapy.
The evidence indicates that doxazosin is effective and generally well tolerated for improving LUTS and PUF in men with symptomatic BPO. Combined therapy was better than doxazosin alone in reducing the risk of clinical progression of BPO and other long-term complications related to BPO.
评估多沙唑嗪治疗与良性前列腺梗阻(BPO)相符的下尿路症状(LUTS)的疗效及不良反应。
纳入荟萃分析的随机对照试验需满足以下条件:研究持续时间≥1个月;研究对象为有症状的BPO男性患者;多沙唑嗪与安慰剂或活性对照进行比较。使用预先制定的方案,将研究和患者特征以及结局数据一式两份提取到标准化表格上。
13项研究涉及6033名男性(平均年龄64岁),符合纳入标准;10项为安慰剂对照研究,其中两项有多沙唑嗪/非那雄胺联合治疗组以及非那雄胺单药治疗组。3项试验为与其他α受体阻滞剂的比较。研究持续时间为1 - 54个月。平均基线症状评分和尿流率峰值表明为中度BPO。在短期至长期内,通过症状评分评估,多沙唑嗪与安慰剂和非那雄胺相比,能显著改善LUTS。两项长期研究(1年和4年)报告,多沙唑嗪组国际前列腺症状评分相对于基线的平均变化分别为 - 8.3和 - 6.6分(-49%和 - 39%),安慰剂组为 - 5.7和 - 4.9分(-33%和 - 29%)。与安慰剂相比,多沙唑嗪显著提高了尿流率峰值。在三项研究的汇总结果中,相对于安慰剂,基线平均变化的加权平均差为1.6 mL/s(95%置信区间1.2 - 2.1)。疗效与其他α1受体阻滞剂相当。在长期(>4年),多沙唑嗪在改善尿流率方面并不比非那雄胺更好。多沙唑嗪与非那雄胺联合使用,相对于单独使用每种药物,在随访>4年的男性中显著降低了BPO总体临床进展的风险。联合治疗、多沙唑嗪和非那雄胺相对于安慰剂的绝对风险降低分别为11.3%、6.9%和6.4%(P < 0.001)。联合治疗在症状评分和尿流率改善方面也显著优于单药治疗,且前者减少了BPO侵入性治疗的需求以及长期尿潴留的风险,尽管相对于安慰剂的绝对风险降低较小(<4%)。多沙唑嗪组头晕和疲劳明显比安慰剂组更常见(分别为11%对7%,6%对3%)。联合治疗报告的不良事件与每种单药治疗相似。
证据表明,多沙唑嗪对改善有症状BPO男性的LUTS和尿流率有效,且总体耐受性良好。联合治疗在降低BPO临床进展风险及其他与BPO相关的长期并发症方面优于单独使用多沙唑嗪。