Soyer P, Levesque M, Elias D, Zeitoun G, Roche A
Department of Radiology, Hopital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France.
Radiology. 1992 May;183(2):541-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.2.1561365.
A prospective study was performed to compare the sensitivities of intraoperative ultrasound (US) and computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) in the depiction of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Twenty-five patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer were evaluated. All patients underwent partial hepatectomy, and 56 metastases were pathologically proved. Preoperatively, CTAP depicted 51 of the 56 metastases (91%). Intraoperative US depicted 54 of the 56 metastases (96%). Intraoperative US depicted three metastases (5%) that were not depicted with CTAP and two that were missed with palpation (3%). Furthermore, intraoperative US did not demonstrate any false-positive lesions. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between the two techniques. The authors concluded that intraoperative US does not enable detection of more liver metastases from colorectal cancer when CTAP is considered as the preoperative standard of reference. Nevertheless, the results of the study suggest that intraoperative US and CTAP are complementary techniques, and the preoperative use of CTAP for determining the feasibility of hepatic resection cannot prevent the use of intraoperative US.
一项前瞻性研究对术中超声(US)和动脉性门静脉造影计算机断层扫描(CTAP)在描绘结直肠癌肝转移方面的敏感性进行了比较。对25例结直肠癌肝转移患者进行了评估。所有患者均接受了肝部分切除术,56处转移灶经病理证实。术前,CTAP显示了56处转移灶中的51处(91%)。术中超声显示了56处转移灶中的54处(96%)。术中超声显示了3处CTAP未显示的转移灶(5%)和2处触诊遗漏的转移灶(3%)。此外,术中超声未显示任何假阳性病变。两种技术在敏感性方面无统计学显著差异。作者得出结论,当将CTAP视为术前参考标准时,术中超声并不能检测出更多的结直肠癌肝转移灶。然而,研究结果表明,术中超声和CTAP是互补技术,术前使用CTAP来确定肝切除的可行性并不能排除术中超声的使用。