Kingsley G, Panayi G
Guy's Hospital, University of London, England.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1992 Feb;18(1):49-66.
In this article, the mechanisms by which infection at a distant site could lead to ReA and whether they could explain the association of ReA with HLA-B27 have been discussed. We propose that ReA synovitis is primarily due to specific synovial T-cell proliferation to fragments of the triggering bacterial found in the joint. Nonspecific T cells amplify synovitis with antibodies playing only a secondary role. First, we have shown that the triggering bacterial antigen is present in a nonviable form in ReA synovium and that this, not cross-reactive joint autoantigen, stimulates the specific synovial immune response. Second, the studies of the humoral immune response in ReA have been reviewed. Further evidence of bacterial persistence in the joint comes from work demonstrating intrasynovial bacteria-specific antibody synthesis. Continuing maturation of the antibody response also points to persisting antigen. In enteric but not genitourinary ReA, the humoral response is mainly IgA, implying chronic stimulation of the gut mucosa. Analysis of the molecules against which the humoral response is directed has shown no difference between yersinia arthritis and yersiniosis, but in CTA, the response to the 57kD and 59kD antigens differs from CT urethritis suggesting they may be arthritogenic. Finally, the antibody response may be absent in ReA patients rendering antibody titres diagnostically less useful and confirming their secondary role in the pathogenesis of synovitis. Third, studies of cellular response in ReA have been analyzed. We show there is a specific synovial MNC proliferative response to fragments of the triggering bacteria found in the joint, which is potentially of diagnostic use. The proliferation is due to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and restricted by MHC class I and II antigens. This antigen-specific T-cell response is accompanied by an antigen-independent recruitment of nonspecific T cells, which may contribute to the amplification of synovitis. The importance of the synovial APC in determining the synovial immune response is unarguable but the exact mechanisms are unclear. Further details on the possible role of HLA-B27 in the presentation of arthritogenic peptides and on the exact identity of the antigenic epitopes recognized in ReA must await analysis of a large panel of T-cell clones. Finally, it is hoped that advances in this field will lead to specific and effective immunologic therapies or vaccines for this currently untreatable disease.
在本文中,已讨论了远处部位感染导致反应性关节炎(ReA)的机制以及它们是否能解释ReA与HLA - B27的关联。我们提出,ReA滑膜炎主要是由于特异性滑膜T细胞对关节中发现的触发细菌片段的增殖。非特异性T细胞通过抗体仅起次要作用来放大滑膜炎。首先,我们已表明触发细菌抗原以无活性形式存在于ReA滑膜中,并且是这种抗原而非交叉反应性关节自身抗原刺激特异性滑膜免疫反应。其次,已对ReA中体液免疫反应的研究进行了综述。关节中细菌持续存在的进一步证据来自于证明滑膜内细菌特异性抗体合成的研究。抗体反应的持续成熟也表明抗原持续存在。在肠道而非泌尿生殖系统ReA中,体液反应主要是IgA,这意味着肠道黏膜受到慢性刺激。针对体液反应所针对分子的分析表明,耶尔森菌关节炎和耶尔森菌病之间没有差异,但在衣原体关节炎(CTA)中,对57kD和59kD抗原的反应与衣原体尿道炎不同,这表明它们可能是致关节炎的。最后,ReA患者可能不存在抗体反应,使得抗体滴度在诊断上用处较小,并证实了它们在滑膜炎发病机制中的次要作用。第三,已分析了ReA中细胞反应的研究。我们表明,滑膜单个核细胞(MNC)对关节中发现的触发细菌片段有特异性增殖反应,这可能具有诊断用途。这种增殖是由CD4 +和CD8 + T细胞引起的,并受MHC I类和II类抗原限制。这种抗原特异性T细胞反应伴随着非特异性T细胞的抗原非依赖性募集,这可能有助于滑膜炎的放大。滑膜抗原呈递细胞(APC)在决定滑膜免疫反应中的重要性是无可争议的,但确切机制尚不清楚。关于HLA - B27在致关节炎肽呈递中的可能作用以及ReA中识别的抗原表位的确切身份的进一步细节,必须等待对大量T细胞克隆的分析。最后,希望该领域的进展将为这种目前无法治疗的疾病带来特异性和有效的免疫疗法或疫苗。