Suppr超能文献

创伤性结肠损伤的难题

The conundrum of traumatic colon injury.

作者信息

Fealk Michael, Osipov Robert, Foster Kevin, Caruso Daniel, Kassir Andrew

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Maricopa Integrated Health Systems, 2601 E. Roosevelt Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.057.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical care in the case of traumatic injury to the colon has changed significantly. During World War II, diversion was dictum. Current trends favor primary repair.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of traumatic colon injuries at an urban level 1 trauma center was performed. Multiple data points were collected. Colon-related complications were examined in detail.

RESULTS

Seventy-four charts fulfilled inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were treated with primary repair. The median Colon Injury Scale (CIS) grade was 2, and the average Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Index (PATI) score was 19. Patients repaired by diversion suffered more colon-related complications; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The emerging dictum for traumatic colon injuries is primary repair. Questions remain as to whether primary repair is the safest option for all colon injuries. The PATI score, CIS grade, and multiple other factors should be included in the decision making algorithm with an emphasis on primary repair.

摘要

背景

结肠创伤性损伤的外科治疗已发生显著变化。在第二次世界大战期间,结肠造口术是常规做法。目前的趋势倾向于一期修复。

方法

对一家城市一级创伤中心的创伤性结肠损伤进行回顾性病历审查。收集了多个数据点。详细检查了与结肠相关的并发症。

结果

74份病历符合纳入标准。大多数患者接受了一期修复。结肠损伤量表(CIS)的中位数等级为2,穿透性腹部创伤指数(PATI)的平均评分为19。通过结肠造口术修复的患者出现更多与结肠相关的并发症;然而,差异无统计学意义。

结论

创伤性结肠损伤的新常规做法是一期修复。对于所有结肠损伤,一期修复是否是最安全的选择仍存在疑问。在决策算法中应纳入PATI评分、CIS等级和其他多个因素,重点是一期修复。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验