• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母婴同睡:理解相关争论并最大限度提高婴儿安全性。

Mother-infant co-sleeping: understanding the debate and maximizing infant safety.

作者信息

Mesich Heather M

机构信息

Meno-Ya-Win Health Centre, Canada.

出版信息

MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):30-7; quiz 38-9.

PMID:15622145
Abstract

Mother-infant co-sleeping is debated fervently in the research literature. While studies abound, there is no precise answer to this conundrum, and parents continue to ask nurses for their best opinions about the safety of co-sleeping. The puzzling results of these studies have occurred partly because of: (1) retrospective study designs, (2) lack of control over covariables, (3) misclassification of infant deaths, and (4) unknown prevalence of co-sleeping practices. This article describes the salient issues nurses need to understand in the mother-infant co-sleeping debate, and suggests ways that nurses can help parents to modify risk factors and safety measures if they desire co-sleeping.

摘要

母婴同睡在研究文献中引发了激烈的争论。虽然相关研究众多,但这个难题尚无确切答案,家长们仍不断向护士询问他们对于同睡安全性的最佳看法。这些研究结果令人困惑,部分原因在于:(1)回顾性研究设计;(2)对协变量缺乏控制;(3)婴儿死亡的错误分类;(4)同睡行为的未知流行率。本文描述了护士在母婴同睡争论中需要理解的关键问题,并提出了一些方法,即如果家长希望同睡,护士可以帮助他们改变危险因素并采取安全措施。

相似文献

1
Mother-infant co-sleeping: understanding the debate and maximizing infant safety.母婴同睡:理解相关争论并最大限度提高婴儿安全性。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):30-7; quiz 38-9.
2
Parent-infant co-sleeping and its relationship to breastfeeding.母婴同床睡眠及其与母乳喂养的关系。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2006.04.006.
3
Socio-cultural perceptions of sudden infant death syndrome among migrant Indian mothers.印度移民母亲对婴儿猝死综合征的社会文化认知
J Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Nov;45(11):670-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01593.x. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
4
Bedsharing and co-sleeping.
RCM Midwives. 2004 Oct;7(10):419-21.
5
Sleep practices and environment and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in Turkey.土耳其的睡眠习惯、环境与婴儿猝死综合征风险
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Oct;12(4):253-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2007.00120.x.
6
Infant sleeping arrangements and practices during the first year of life.婴儿出生后第一年的睡眠安排与习惯。
Pediatrics. 2008 Oct;122 Suppl 2:S113-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1315o.
7
Mother-infant cosleeping, breastfeeding and sudden infant death syndrome: what biological anthropology has discovered about normal infant sleep and pediatric sleep medicine.母婴同睡、母乳喂养与婴儿猝死综合征:生物人类学对正常婴儿睡眠及儿科睡眠医学的发现
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;Suppl 45:133-61. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20736.
8
Bedsharing and maternal smoking in a population-based survey of new mothers.一项针对初为人母者的基于人群的调查中的同床共眠与母亲吸烟情况
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e530-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0354.
9
Credibility gap? Parents' beliefs about reducing the risk of cot death.可信度差距?父母对降低婴儿猝死风险的看法。
Community Pract. 2009 Nov;82(11):21-4.
10
[Co-sleeping with infants--modify the advice a little bit!].[与婴儿同睡——稍微修改一下建议!]
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(12):955-7; discussion 957-8.

引用本文的文献

1
"Same Room, Safe Place".“同一房间,安全之地”
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Apr;8(2):94-96. doi: 10.1177/2150131916670067. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
2
Reasons for mother-infant bed-sharing: a systematic narrative synthesis of the literature and implications for future research.母婴同床睡眠的原因:文献的系统叙述性综合及对未来研究的启示
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):675-90. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1557-1.
3
What new mothers need to know: perspectives from women and providers in Georgia.新妈妈需要知道的:来自格鲁吉亚女性和提供者的观点。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 May;18(4):839-51. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1308-8.