Ward Trina C Salm
University of Georgia, 310 E Campus Rd, Athens, GA, 30602-7016, USA,
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):675-90. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1557-1.
Mother-infant bed-sharing has been a common practice for centuries. Understanding the reasons parents choose to bed-share can help tailor safe sleep education. The purpose of this article was to systematically review the international literature on: (1) reasons parents bed-share, (2) the cultural context of bed-sharing, and (3) implications for interventions and future research. The search occurred August-September 2013 via PubMed, CINAHL, and Psyc INFO using the terms: "infant," "sleep," "bed shar*," "co sleep*," "sleep location," "sleep practices," and "sleep arrangements," alone or in combination. Google Scholar was searched using: "bed share," "bed sharing," "co sleep," and "co sleeping." Inclusion criteria were: (1) referenced bed-sharing with infants 12 months or younger; (2) provided reasons for bed-sharing; and (3) published between 1990 and 2013. Studies were excluded if they focused on disorders such as epilepsy, breathing disorders, or among multi-gestational infants. Narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings. Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria. The main themes around bed-sharing based on this synthesis included: (1) breastfeeding, (2) comforting, (3) better/more sleep, (4) monitoring, (5) bonding/attachment, (6) environmental, (7) crying, (8) tradition, (9) disagree with danger, and (10) maternal instinct. Findings suggest that future research should examine parents' decision-making process on infant sleep location, including how they weigh personal reasons and sources of advice. Public health interventions should incorporate the particular reasons of the population they are targeting. Clinicians should discuss infant sleep environment with each family, along with their motivations for choosing this environment, and work within that framework to address the safety of the sleep environment.
母婴同床共眠几个世纪以来一直是一种常见的做法。了解父母选择同床共眠的原因有助于开展有针对性的安全睡眠教育。本文的目的是系统回顾国际文献,内容包括:(1)父母同床共眠的原因;(2)同床共眠的文化背景;(3)对干预措施及未来研究的启示。检索于2013年8月至9月通过PubMed、CINAHL和Psyc INFO进行,使用的检索词为:“婴儿”“睡眠”“同床*”“共眠*”“睡眠地点”“睡眠习惯”和“睡眠安排”等单独或组合形式。通过谷歌学术搜索“同床”“同床共眠”“共眠”等词。纳入标准为:(1)提及与12个月及以下婴儿同床共眠;(2)提供同床共眠的原因;(3)发表于1990年至2013年之间。如果研究聚焦于癫痫、呼吸障碍等疾病或多胞胎婴儿,则予以排除。采用叙述性综合分析来总结研究结果。34项研究符合纳入标准。基于该综合分析得出的同床共眠的主要主题包括:(1)母乳喂养;(2)安抚;(3)睡眠更好/更多;(4)监护;(5)情感联结/依恋;(6)环境因素;(7)哭闹;(8)传统;(9)不认同存在危险;(10)母性本能。研究结果表明,未来的研究应考察父母在婴儿睡眠地点方面的决策过程,包括他们如何权衡个人原因及建议来源等情况。公共卫生干预措施应纳入其目标人群的具体原因。临床医生应与每个家庭讨论婴儿的睡眠环境,以及他们选择该环境背后的动机,并在此框架内致力于解决睡眠环境的安全性问题。