Yildiz Karamehmet, Madenoglu Halit, Dogru Kudret, Kotanoglu Mustafa Sirri, Akin Aynur, Boyaci Adem
Department of Anaesthesiology, Erciyes University Gevher Nesibe Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jan;17(1):9-12.
This study was conducted to compare the effects of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl combined with bupivacaine infiltration on the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion. 120 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective craniotomy were included. The fentanyl group (group F, n = 60) received fentanyl during induction and prior to skull pin insertion (2 and 1 microg . kg, respectively). The fentanyl-bupivacaine group (group FB, n = 60) received the same doses of fentanyl as well as scalp infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine. The heart rate (HR) was not significantly different between the groups. HR, at 5 minutes after skull pin insertion in the group F and at 1 and 5 minutes after skull pin insertion in group FB, significantly decreased in comparison to the baseline values (P < 0.05). In both groups, HR at 1 and 5 minutes after skull pin insertion was significantly lower than HR just before skull pin insertion (P < 0.05). In group FB, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 and 5 minutes after skull pin insertion were significantly lower than that in group F (P < 0.05). In group F, MAP at 1 minute after skull pin insertion was higher than that of just before skull pin insertion (P < 0.05); however, MAP at 5 minutes after skull pin insertion was lower than that of just before skull pin insertion (P < 0.05). In group FB, MAP at 1 and 5 minutes after skull pin insertion was lower than that of just before skull pin insertion (P < 0.05). The hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion was effectively suppressed with both methods. Still, the addition of scalp infiltration to fentanyl did not provide any additional benefit. Administering an additional dose (1 microg . kg) of fentanyl just before skull pin insertion is recommended as a simple and effective option that requires no extra time.
本研究旨在比较静脉注射芬太尼以及静脉注射芬太尼联合布比卡因浸润对颅骨针插入时血流动力学反应的影响。纳入120例拟行择期开颅手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级患者。芬太尼组(F组,n = 60)在诱导期及颅骨针插入前分别给予芬太尼(2和1μg·kg)。芬太尼-布比卡因组(FB组,n = 60)给予相同剂量的芬太尼以及0.25%布比卡因头皮浸润。两组心率(HR)无显著差异。与基线值相比,F组颅骨针插入后5分钟以及FB组颅骨针插入后1分钟和5分钟时的HR显著降低(P < 0.05)。在两组中,颅骨针插入后1分钟和5分钟时的HR均显著低于颅骨针插入前的HR(P < 0.05)。在FB组,颅骨针插入后1分钟和5分钟时的平均动脉压(MAP)显著低于F组(P < 0.05)。在F组,颅骨针插入后1分钟时的MAP高于颅骨针插入前(P < 0.05);然而,颅骨针插入后5分钟时的MAP低于颅骨针插入前(P < 0.05)。在FB组,颅骨针插入后1分钟和5分钟时的MAP低于颅骨针插入前(P < 0.05)。两种方法均有效抑制了颅骨针插入时的血流动力学反应。尽管如此,在芬太尼基础上加用头皮浸润并未带来额外益处。建议在颅骨针插入前额外给予一剂(1μg·kg)芬太尼,这是一种简单有效的选择,无需额外时间。