Rubboli Andrea, Colletta Mauro, Sangiorgio Pietro, Di Pasquale Giuseppe
Division of Cardiology, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Ital Heart J. 2004 Nov;5(11):851-6.
In the absence of evidence-based data, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after coronary artery stenting in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) remains unknown. In order to investigate current practice in this setting, an international survey was carried out.
A questionnaire was e-mailed to 40 internationally renowned, foreign Interventional Centers worldwide.
Out of the 24 Centers (60%) replying, only in 13 (54%) is antithrombotic treatment carried out in accordance with a standardized protocol. OAC is stopped in favor of aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel in selected (low thromboembolic risk) conditions in 13 (54%) Centers. When OAC is continued, the association with a single antiplatelet is employed in a few Centers only, as opposed to triple antithrombotic treatment (OAC and aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel) which is adopted, selectively or systematically, in the majority (83%) of Centers. In 8 (33%) Centers adopting triple antithrombotic treatment, the dose of OAC is decreased in all patients, whereas in 9 (38%) it is left unchanged. Upon completion of 1 to 3-6 months of antithrombotic treatment with OAC and single/dual antiplatelets, in 9 (38%) Centers this regimen is continued indefinitely, whereas in 10 (41%) antiplatelets are systematically withdrawn. Out of the 13 Centers, selectively exchanging OAC for aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel, low- or full-dose low-molecular-weight heparin is added in selected (high thromboembolic risk) cases in 3 (23%) and 5 (38%) Centers, respectively. Following 1 to 3-6 months of aspirin plus ticlopidine/clopidogrel antithrombotic treatment, OAC is resumed in all cases in 9 (69%) Centers and in no cases in 1 (8%).
Our survey shows a high variability in the current antithrombotic treatment of patients on chronic OAC undergoing coronary artery stenting. Although various regimens may be adopted, the optimal antithrombotic treatment for this patient subset still needs to be identified.
在缺乏循证数据的情况下,长期口服抗凝药(OAC)治疗的患者冠状动脉支架置入术后的最佳抗栓治疗方案仍不明确。为了调查当前这种情况下的治疗实践,开展了一项国际调查。
向全球40个国际知名的国外介入中心发送了调查问卷。
在回复的24个中心(60%)中,只有13个中心(54%)按照标准化方案进行抗栓治疗。在13个中心(54%),在特定(低血栓栓塞风险)情况下停用OAC,改为使用阿司匹林加噻氯匹定/氯吡格雷。当继续使用OAC时,只有少数中心采用OAC与单一抗血小板药物联合使用,而大多数中心(83%)选择性或系统性地采用三联抗栓治疗(OAC、阿司匹林加噻氯匹定/氯吡格雷)。在采用三联抗栓治疗的8个中心(33%),所有患者的OAC剂量均降低,而在9个中心(38%),OAC剂量保持不变。在使用OAC和单一/双联抗血小板药物进行1至3 - 6个月的抗栓治疗后,9个中心(38%)无限期继续该治疗方案,而在10个中心(41%)则系统性停用抗血小板药物。在13个中心中,在选择性将OAC换为阿司匹林加噻氯匹定/氯吡格雷的情况下,分别有3个中心(23%)和5个中心(38%)在特定(高血栓栓塞风险)病例中加用低剂量或全剂量低分子肝素。在进行1至3 - 6个月的阿司匹林加噻氯匹定/氯吡格雷抗栓治疗后,9个中心(69%)在所有病例中恢复使用OAC,1个中心(8%)在所有病例中均未恢复使用OAC。
我们的调查显示,目前对接受冠状动脉支架置入术的长期OAC治疗患者的抗栓治疗存在很大差异。尽管可能采用各种治疗方案,但仍需确定该患者亚组的最佳抗栓治疗方案。