Suppr超能文献

桡骨头粉碎性骨折。切除术与内固定术的比较。

Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Comparison of resection and internal fixation.

作者信息

Ikeda Masayoshi, Sugiyama Kazuhiro, Kang Chonte, Takagaki Tomonori, Oka Yoshinori

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University Oiso Hospital, 21-1 Gakkyo, Oiso, Naka-gun Kanagawa, 259-0198, Japan.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):76-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01323.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Satisfactory internal fixation of comminuted radial head fractures is often difficult to achieve, and radial head resection has been the accepted treatment. In this study, we compared the results of radial head resection with those of open reduction and internal fixation in patients with a comminuted radial head fracture.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with a Mason type-III radial head fracture (some with associated injuries) were enrolled in the study. Fifteen patients underwent radial head resection as the initial treatment (Group I), and thirteen patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (Group II). The age at the operation averaged 41.1 and 38.2 years, respectively, and the duration of follow-up averaged ten and three years, respectively. The outcomes were assessed on the basis of pain, motion, radiographic findings, and strength measured with Cybex testing. The overall outcome was rated with the functional rating score described by Broberg and Morrey and with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form.

RESULTS

Elbow motion averaged 15.5 degrees (extension loss) to 131.4 degrees (flexion) in Group I and 7.1 degrees to 133.8 degrees in Group II. The carrying angle and ulnar variance averaged 8.2 degrees and 1.9 mm in Group I and 1.5 degrees and 0.5 mm in Group II. Compared with Group II, Group I had a loss of strength in extension, pronation, and supination (p < 0.01). The Broberg and Morrey functional rating score averaged 81.4 points in Group I and 90.7 points in Group II (p = 0.0034). The score on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form averaged 87.3 points in Group I and 94.6 points in Group II (p = 0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients in whom the comminuted radial head fracture was treated with open reduction and internal fixation had satisfactory joint motion, with greater strength and better function than the patients who had undergone radial head resection. These results support a recommendation for open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of this fracture.

摘要

背景

粉碎性桡骨头骨折常常难以实现令人满意的内固定,桡骨头切除术一直是公认的治疗方法。在本研究中,我们比较了粉碎性桡骨头骨折患者桡骨头切除术与切开复位内固定术的治疗结果。

方法

28例Mason III型桡骨头骨折患者(部分伴有其他损伤)纳入本研究。15例患者接受桡骨头切除术作为初始治疗(I组),13例患者接受切开复位内固定术(II组)。手术时的平均年龄分别为41.1岁和38.2岁,随访时间平均分别为10年和3年。根据疼痛、活动度、影像学表现以及通过Cybex测试测量的力量来评估结果。总体结果采用Broberg和Morrey描述的功能评分以及美国肩肘外科医师学会肘关节评估表进行评定。

结果

I组肘关节活动度平均为伸展丧失15.5度至屈曲131.4度,II组为7.1度至133.8度。提携角和尺骨变异I组平均为8.2度和1.9毫米,II组为1.5度和0.5毫米。与II组相比,I组在伸展、旋前和旋后方面力量有所丧失(p < 0.01)。Broberg和Morrey功能评分I组平均为81.4分,II组为90.7分(p = 0.0034)。美国肩肘外科医师学会肘关节评估表评分I组平均为87.3分,II组为94.6分(p = 0.0031)。

结论

切开复位内固定治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的患者关节活动度良好,与接受桡骨头切除术的患者相比力量更强、功能更好。这些结果支持在治疗此类骨折时采用切开复位内固定术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验