• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.

作者信息

Chuong Cheng-Jen, Borotikar Bhushan, Schwartz-Dabney Carina, Sinn Douglas P

机构信息

Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jan;63(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.045.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.045
PMID:15635560
Abstract

PURPOSE

Using finite element (FE) computer model simulation, we compared the mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) through the use of 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the reconstructed geometry from computed tomography scans of dry adult skull with a mandibular deformity requiring surgical correction, we developed 3-dimensional FE models that simulate BSSRO with 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. Technique 1 uses 3 bicortical titanium screws. Technique 2 uses a curved titanium plate with 4 monocortical screws. Five different load cases were applied to the mandible after the simulated BSSRO with the mandible being constrained at both temporomandibular joints. To evaluate the efficacy of these 2 stabilization techniques, we compared 1) the resulting deflections at the central incisor, 2) the mechanical stresses developed in the bone in the vicinity of the stabilizing implants, and 3) the mechanical stresses developed within the screw/plating system themselves.

RESULTS

Technique 1, using 3 bicortical titanium screws, leads to smaller deflections at the central incisor for all 5 load cases, suggesting higher mechanical stability. Technique 1 also leads to lower mechanical stresses in the bone and in the implanted screws, whereas technique 2 is associated with higher values in each of these quantities.

CONCLUSIONS

To stabilize osteotomies after a 3-dimensional simulated BSSRO, 3 bicortical screws forming an inverted-L configuration are shown to offer more effective load transmission in the mandibular construct. This technique, when examined in an FE model, leads to higher stability with lower mechanical stresses in the bone near the bicortical screws.

摘要

相似文献

1
Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jan;63(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.045.
2
Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?固定方式是否会影响下颌前伸术后的颞下颌关节?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.三维有限元分析用于比较下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后的固定方法:后退手术-后牙加载。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Apr;43(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.10.007.
4
Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.使用有限元方法分析可吸收接骨板和螺钉固定双侧下颌支矢状劈开截骨术时的应力分布。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jun;70(6):1434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
5
Bicortical screw stabilization of sagittal split osteotomies.矢状劈开截骨术的双皮质螺钉固定
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.07.003.
6
Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.使用个体模型对双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中骨固定的三维有限元分析
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2018;59(2):67-78. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2013-3000.
7
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
8
Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.使用三维有限元分析比较矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术后不同固定方法。第1部分:前徙术-后向加载
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;34(5):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.10.009.
9
An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.一种可调节骨固定系统的体外比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.008.
10
Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.不同矢状劈开截骨术 10mm 骨段前移固定技术的比较评价:力学测试和螺钉旋入扭矩。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;46(12):2082-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of two stable internal fixation techniques in mandibular ramus sagittal osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element study.下颌支矢状劈开截骨术中两种稳定内固定技术的评估:三维有限元研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 27;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z.
2
Analysis of vertical loading forces on three different sagittal split ramus osteotomy modifications.三种不同矢状劈开下颌支截骨改良术垂直加载力的分析
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 6;29(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01346-2.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of stability after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy for advancement by Obwegeser-Dal Pont and Puricelli techniques using three-dimensional finite elements.
下颌骨矢状劈开截骨术推进术(Obwegeser-Dal Pont 和 Puricelli 技术)稳定性的三维有限元生物力学评估
Head Face Med. 2024 Nov 6;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00468-4.
4
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
5
Three Different Fixation Modalities following Mandibular Setback Surgery with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Comparative Study using Three-dimensional Finite Elements Analysis.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨后退术后三种不同固定方式:一项三维有限元分析的比较研究
World J Plast Surg. 2023;12(1):43-57. doi: 10.52547/wjps.12.1.43.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques following modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy using buccal step: An study.使用颊侧台阶改良矢状劈开下颌支截骨术后不同固定技术的生物力学评估:一项研究。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep-Dec;13(3):443-448. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_321_21. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
7
Assessment of Resorbable and Non-resorbable Fixation Systems in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: An In vitro Study.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术中可吸收与不可吸收固定系统的评估:一项体外研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Sep;21(3):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01581-6. Epub 2021 May 2.
8
Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An study.双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后五种内固定方法的强度比较:一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Aug 14;17(4):258-265. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
9
Biomechanical Analysis of the Forces Exerted during Different Occlusion Conditions following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Treatment for Mandibular Deficiency.双侧矢状劈开截骨术治疗下颌骨缺损后不同咬合条件下施加力的生物力学分析
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2019 Jun 2;2019:4989013. doi: 10.1155/2019/4989013. eCollection 2019.
10
Botulinum toxin-A injection into the anterior belly of the digastric muscle for the prevention of post-operative open bite in class II malocclusions: a case report and literature review.注射肉毒杆菌毒素A至二腹肌前腹预防Ⅱ类错牙合术后开牙合:1例报告及文献复习
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr 26;41(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40902-019-0201-9. eCollection 2019 Dec.