• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌支矢状劈开截骨术中两种稳定内固定技术的评估:三维有限元研究

Evaluation of two stable internal fixation techniques in mandibular ramus sagittal osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element study.

作者信息

Silva Kaline de Moura, Machado Leonardo Mendes Ribeiro, Leite Milena Gomes Melo, Noritomi Pedro Yoshito, de Jesus Giorge Pessoa, de Moura Andrezza Lauria

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 27;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z
PMID:40011258
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare, using finite elements three-dimensional (3D) analysis, two techniques of stable internal fixation in 2 patterns of sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and the repercussions of occlusal load distribution in the postoperative period.

METHODS

A 3D finite element model of a hemimandible was created. The models were divided into 2 split patterns of SSRO advanced 5 mm forward, a split pattern (1) following the Epker osteotomy design and another split pattern (2) following Posnick osteotomy design, simulated by CAD (Computer Aided Engineering) Rhinoceros 3D. Two internal fixation techniques were simulated by HyperMesh: A- one titanium miniplate of the Arnett system (1 mm) for orthognathic surgery fixed with four monocortical screws; B- one titanium plate fixed with four monocortical screws and one bicortical screw. Resistance, stress and displacement were analyzed applying a 200 N vertical load to the occlusal surface region of the mandibular first molar and a 100 N to the incisal surface of the mandibular central incisor.

RESULTS

The results were presented through the von Mises stress analysis. A difference in the displacement of the models fixed with only one miniplate and four monocortical screws was observed. The models with split pattern (2) presented smaller displacements when compared to the split pattern (1). For metallic components, the split pattern (2) exhibits lower strain values, although it has no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

The fixation technique B proved to be more rigid and lower stress values both in the bone and in the plate, as well as lower deformation and displacements were shown in comparison to fixation technique A for all mandibular movements and forces.

摘要

目的

采用有限元三维(3D)分析方法,评估和比较矢状劈开下颌支截骨术(SSRO)两种模式下的两种稳定内固定技术以及术后咬合负荷分布的影响。

方法

创建半侧下颌骨的3D有限元模型。这些模型被分为两种SSRO劈开模式,向前推进5毫米,一种劈开模式(1)遵循Epker截骨术设计,另一种劈开模式(2)遵循Posnick截骨术设计,由计算机辅助工程(CAD)软件Rhinoceros 3D模拟。通过HyperMesh模拟两种内固定技术:A - 用于正颌手术的Arnett系统的一块1毫米钛小板,用四个单皮质螺钉固定;B - 一块钛板,用四个单皮质螺钉和一个双皮质螺钉固定。在下颌第一磨牙的咬合面区域施加200 N垂直载荷,在下颌中切牙的切缘表面施加100 N载荷,分析阻力、应力和位移。

结果

结果通过冯·米塞斯应力分析呈现。观察到仅用一块小板和四个单皮质螺钉固定的模型在位移上存在差异。与劈开模式(1)相比,劈开模式(2)的模型位移较小。对于金属部件,劈开模式(2)的应变值较低,尽管没有显著差异。

结论

与固定技术A相比,在所有下颌运动和力的情况下,固定技术B在骨和板中都表现出更高的刚性和更低的应力值,以及更低的变形和位移。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of two stable internal fixation techniques in mandibular ramus sagittal osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element study.下颌支矢状劈开截骨术中两种稳定内固定技术的评估:三维有限元研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Feb 27;29(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01357-z.
2
Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?固定方式是否会影响下颌前伸术后的颞下颌关节?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.矢状劈开下颌支截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:后退手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):941-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.106. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.三维有限元分析比较五种不同矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术的固定技术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
5
Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析法对当前和新型设计的下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术微型接骨板固定技术的比较评估。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Nov 1;28(6):e553-e561. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25964.
6
An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术的坚固内固定技术的体外评估:前徙手术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):809-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.009.
7
Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.使用个体模型对双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术中骨固定的三维有限元分析
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2018;59(2):67-78. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2013-3000.
8
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.下颌后缩矢状劈开下颌支截骨术固定方法的体外生物力学评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;43(2):186-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Internal fixation of short bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: A mechanical evaluation.下颌升支双侧矢状劈开截骨术的内固定:力学评估
Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Apr;133(2):e70006. doi: 10.1111/eos.70006. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
10
Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.不同固位技术在 10mm 矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术中的比较评价。第二部分:有限元分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1015-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.不同固位技术在 10mm 矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术中的比较评价。第二部分:有限元分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul;47(7):1015-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
2
Mandible-first sequence in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.双颌正颌手术中的下颌优先序列:一项系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;45(4):472-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Stress distribution of posts on the endodontically treated teeth with and without bone height augmentation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
有无骨高度增加的根管治疗后牙齿桩的应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):196-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157242.
4
Assessment of sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques using a finite element method.使用有限元方法评估下颌升支矢状劈开截骨坚固内固定技术
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;44(7):823-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
5
Finite element evaluation of three methods of stable fixation of condyle base fractures.髁突基部骨折三种稳定固定方法的有限元评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;43(10):1251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
6
A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis.对下颌前突矢状劈开截骨术的机械、光弹和有限元分析的混合固定技术的比较评价。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5 Suppl):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.027. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Scaffold informatics and biomimetic design: three-dimensional medical reconstruction.支架信息学与仿生设计:三维医学重建
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;868:91-109. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_6.
8
Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.三维有限元分析比较五种不同矢状劈开下颌支骨切开术的固定技术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
9
A biomechanical analysis of titanium miniplates used for treatment of mandibular symphyseal fractures with the finite element method.使用有限元方法对用于治疗下颌骨联合部骨折的钛微型接骨板进行生物力学分析。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.003.
10
Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.下颌前徙矢状劈开截骨术不同固定技术的生物力学与光弹性比较评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan;68(1):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.004.