• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大速度下不同游泳姿势的主动阻力、有用机械功率输出和水动力系数。

Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity.

作者信息

Kolmogorov S V, Duplishcheva O A

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education, Archangel Teachers' Training Institute, U.S.S.R.

出版信息

J Biomech. 1992 Mar;25(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-y.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-y
PMID:1564064
Abstract

By comparing the time of the same distance swum with and without an added resistance, under the assumption of an equal power output in both cases, the drag of 73 top swimmers was estimated. The active drag Fr(a.d.) at maximal swimming velocities varied considerably across strokes and individuals. In the females Fr(a.d.) ranged from 69.78 to 31.16 N in the front-crawl, from 83.04 to 37.78 N in dolphin, from 93.56 to 45.19 N in breaststroke, and from 65.51 to 37.79 N in back-stroke. In the males Fr(a.d.) ranged from 167.11 to 42.23 N in front-crawl, from 156.09 to 46.95 N in dolphin, from 176.87 to 55.61 N in breaststroke, and from 146.28 to 46.36 N in back-stroke. Also, the ratio of Fr(a.d.) to the passive drag Fr(a.d.) as determined for the analogical velocity in a tugging condition (in standard body position-front gliding) shows considerable individual variations. In the female swimmers variations in Fr(a.d.)/Fr(p.d.) ranged from 145.17 to 59.94% in front-crawl, from 192.39 to 85.57% in dolphin, from 298.03 to 124.50% in breaststroke, and from 162.87 to 85.61% in back-stroke. In the male swimmers variations in Fr(a.d.)/Fr(p.d.) ranged from 162.24 to 62.39% in front-crawl, from 191.70 to 70.38% in dolphin, from 295.57 to 102.83% in breaststroke, and from 198.82 to 74.48% in back-stroke. The main reason for such variations is found in the individual features of swimming technique and can be quantitatively estimated with the hydrodynamic force coefficient, which thus provides an adequate index of technique.

摘要

在两种情况下功率输出相等的假设下,通过比较有无附加阻力时游相同距离的时间,估算了73名顶尖游泳运动员的阻力。最大游泳速度下的主动阻力Fr(a.d.)在不同泳姿和个体间差异很大。在女性中,自由泳的Fr(a.d.)范围为69.78至31.16牛,蝶泳为83.04至37.78牛,蛙泳为93.56至45.19牛,仰泳为65.51至37.79牛。在男性中,自由泳的Fr(a.d.)范围为167.11至42.23牛,蝶泳为156.09至46.95牛,蛙泳为176.87至55.61牛,仰泳为146.28至46.36牛。此外,在拖曳状态(标准身体姿势 - 前滑行)下针对类比速度确定的Fr(a.d.)与被动阻力Fr(p.d.)的比值也显示出相当大的个体差异。在女性游泳运动员中,自由泳的Fr(a.d.)/Fr(p.d.)变化范围为145.17至59.94%,蝶泳为192.39至85.57%,蛙泳为298.03至124.50%,仰泳为162.87至85.61%。在男性游泳运动员中,自由泳的Fr(a.d.)/Fr(p.d.)变化范围为162.24至62.39%,蝶泳为191.70至70.38%,蛙泳为295.57至102.83%,仰泳为198.82至74.48%。这种差异的主要原因在于游泳技术的个体特征,并且可以用水动力系数进行定量估算,因此水动力系数提供了一个合适的技术指标。

相似文献

1
Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity.最大速度下不同游泳姿势的主动阻力、有用机械功率输出和水动力系数。
J Biomech. 1992 Mar;25(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90028-y.
2
A new device for estimating active drag in swimming at maximal velocity.一种用于估算最大速度游泳时主动阻力的新装置。
J Sports Sci. 2007 Feb 15;25(4):375-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410600812021.
3
Effect of leg kick on active drag in front-crawl swimming: Comparison of whole stroke and arms-only stroke during front-crawl and the streamlined position.腿部打水对自由泳主动阻力的影响:自由泳全程与仅划臂时以及流线型姿势下的比较。
J Biomech. 2018 Jul 25;76:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
How do swimmers control their front crawl swimming velocity? Current knowledge and gaps from hydrodynamic perspectives.游泳者如何控制他们的自由泳速度?从流体动力学角度看当前的认知与差距。
Sports Biomech. 2023 Dec;22(12):1552-1571. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1959946. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke.蝶泳水下划水第一和第二滑行位置时阻力系数的测定。
J Appl Biomech. 2010 Aug;26(3):324-31. doi: 10.1123/jab.26.3.324.
6
Characterization of speed fluctuation and drag force in young swimmers: a gender comparison.年轻游泳运动员速度波动和阻力的特征:性别比较
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Dec;32(6):1214-25. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.07.009. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Load-Velocity Profile and Active Drag in Young Female Swimmers: An Age-Group Comparison.年轻女游泳运动员的速度-负荷曲线和主动阻力:年龄组比较。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Oct 19;19(1):44-52. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0213. Print 2024 Jan 1.
8
The determination of drag in front crawl swimming.自由泳中阻力的测定。
J Biomech. 2004 Nov;37(11):1655-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.020.
9
Active drag related to velocity in male and female swimmers.男女游泳运动员中与速度相关的主动阻力。
J Biomech. 1988;21(5):435-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90149-2.
10
Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming.竞技自由泳的生物力学
Sports Med. 1992 Jan;13(1):8-24. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199213010-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical, Physiological and Anthropometric Determinants of Backstroke Swimming Performance: A Systematic Review.仰泳游泳成绩的生物力学、生理学和人体测量学决定因素:一项系统综述。
Sports Med Open. 2025 Jun 8;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00868-z.
2
Longitudinal monitoring of load-velocity variables in preferred-stroke and front-crawl with national and international swimmers.对国内和国际游泳运动员的仰泳和自由泳中负荷-速度变量进行纵向监测。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 May 7;7:1585319. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1585319. eCollection 2025.
3
The Least Squares Method as a Tool for Assessment of the Stroke Parameters and Velocity in Monofin Swimming.
最小二乘法作为评估单鳍游泳中风参数和速度的工具。
Methods Protoc. 2025 Feb 17;8(1):19. doi: 10.3390/mps8010019.
4
Arm Propulsion in Front Crawl Stroke.自由泳划水动作中的手臂推进力。
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;13(1):6. doi: 10.3390/sports13010006.
5
Understanding the Importance of Drag Coefficient Assessment for a Deeper Insight into the Hydrodynamic Profile of Swimmers.了解阻力系数评估对于深入洞察游泳者水动力轮廓的重要性。
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Nov 28;92:19-27. doi: 10.5114/jhk/172492. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Estimating Active Drag Based on Full and Semi-Tethered Swimming Tests.基于全泳和半泳测试估算主动阻力。
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Mar 1;23(1):17-24. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.17. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Associations between load-velocity profiling and race parameters of elite swimmers in the 100 and 200m freestyle events.100米和200米自由泳项目中优秀游泳运动员的负荷-速度曲线与比赛参数之间的关联。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Dec 14;5:1326106. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1326106. eCollection 2023.
8
Golden ratio and self-similarity in swimming: breast-stroke and the back-stroke.游泳中的黄金比例与自相似性:蛙泳和仰泳
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 24;17:1176866. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1176866. eCollection 2023.
9
A novel method of determining the active drag profile in swimming via data manipulation of multiple tension force collection methods.一种通过对多种张力采集方法的数据处理来确定游泳中有效阻力分布的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37595-y.
10
Agreement between Different Methods to Measure the Active Drag Coefficient in Front-Crawl Swimming.不同方法测量自由泳主动阻力系数之间的一致性
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:41-49. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159605. eCollection 2023 Mar.